rationalism

简明释义

英[ˈræʃnəlɪzəm]美[ˈræʃnəlɪzəm]

n. 理性主义；唯理主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Coleridge was to spend the next thirty years attacking rationalism.

柯尔律治在此后的30年中一直抨击理性主义。

2.Kant think dialectics is a mistaken result of used rationalism, and a mirage of metaphysics.

康德认为辩证法是理性误用的结果，是形而上学的幻象。

3.There are two main forms of moral rationalism, associated with two major forms of reasoning.

有两种主要形式的道德理性，有两个主要形式的推理有关。

4.Relative rationalism or practical rationalism represented by the ancient philosophy of Germany has realized objective rationalism.

而以德国古典哲学为代表的相对理性主义或实践理性主义又实现了客观理性。

5.He cut the third way between the empiricism and the rationalism.

他在经验论与唯理论之间开辟了第三条道路。

6.First, is divided into three parts of traditional educational philosophy discourse of rationalism and digestion.

分为三个部分，首先是对传统理性主义教育哲学话语的批判与消解。

7.Rationalism management and humanism management are the two basic models of teachers' management.

理性管理与人文管理是教师管理的二种基本范式。

8.Rationalism and empiricism are the two main research methods in the field of Natural Language Processing by Computers.

在自然语言的计算机处理中有理性主义和经验主义两种主要的研究方法。

9.In philosophy class, we discussed the principles of rationalism 理性主义 and how it contrasts with empiricism.

在哲学课上，我们讨论了理性主义 rationalism 的原则，以及它与经验主义的对比。

10.The scientist's approach was heavily influenced by rationalism 理性主义, relying on logic and reason to draw conclusions.

这位科学家的方法受到理性主义 rationalism 的强烈影响，依赖逻辑和理性来得出结论。

11.Many Enlightenment thinkers advocated for rationalism 理性主义 as a means to attain knowledge and truth.

许多启蒙时代的思想家提倡理性主义 rationalism，作为获取知识和真理的一种手段。

12.In his writings, Descartes emphasized rationalism 理性主义 and the importance of doubt in the pursuit of knowledge.

在他的著作中，笛卡尔强调了理性主义 rationalism 以及怀疑在追求知识中的重要性。

13.The debate between rationalism 理性主义 and empiricism continues to shape modern philosophical discussions.

关于理性主义 rationalism 和经验主义的辩论继续塑造现代哲学讨论。

作文

In the realm of philosophy, rationalism plays a pivotal role in shaping our understanding of knowledge and reality. Defined as the belief that reason is the primary source of knowledge, rationalism stands in contrast to empiricism, which emphasizes sensory experience as the foundation of knowledge. This philosophical approach has been championed by thinkers such as René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who argued that certain truths can be known independently of experience. The essence of rationalism lies in its assertion that human beings possess innate ideas and that logical reasoning can lead us to uncover universal truths about the world. For instance, Descartes famously stated, 'Cogito, ergo sum' or 'I think, therefore I am,' highlighting the importance of doubt and reason in the pursuit of knowledge. This statement encapsulates the idea that the act of thinking itself is proof of one's existence and, consequently, a starting point for further inquiry into the nature of reality. Moreover, rationalism encourages individuals to question their beliefs and assumptions critically. By relying on reason and logic, one can arrive at conclusions that are not merely based on subjective experiences but are instead grounded in objective analysis. This method of inquiry is particularly significant in the fields of mathematics and science, where logical deductions and theoretical frameworks often lead to groundbreaking discoveries. However, rationalism is not without its critics. Empiricists argue that our understanding of the world is fundamentally rooted in our experiences and that reason alone cannot provide a complete picture. They contend that without empirical evidence, any rational conclusion may lack validity. This debate between rationalism and empiricism has shaped much of modern philosophy and continues to influence discussions in epistemology—the study of knowledge. In contemporary society, the principles of rationalism can be observed in various domains, from scientific research to ethical decision-making. For example, in scientific endeavors, researchers formulate hypotheses and then conduct experiments to test these ideas. This process exemplifies the rationalist approach, as it relies on logical reasoning to derive conclusions from observable data. Furthermore, in ethics, individuals often engage in rational discourse to determine what is right or wrong, weighing the consequences of actions through a logical framework. Despite the advancements made through rationalism, it is essential to recognize the limitations of pure reason. Emotions, cultural contexts, and personal experiences also play significant roles in shaping human understanding and behavior. Thus, a balanced perspective that integrates both rational thought and empirical evidence may offer a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues. In conclusion, rationalism remains a foundational concept in philosophy that emphasizes the significance of reason in the acquisition of knowledge. While it has its limitations, the principles of rationalism continue to influence various fields, encouraging critical thinking and logical analysis. As we navigate an increasingly complex world, embracing the insights of rationalism while acknowledging the value of empirical evidence may lead to a richer and more nuanced understanding of our reality.

在哲学领域，理性主义在塑造我们对知识和现实的理解方面发挥着关键作用。理性主义被定义为信仰理性是知识的主要来源，这与强调感官经验作为知识基础的经验主义形成对比。这种哲学方法得到了如勒内·笛卡尔、巴鲁克·斯宾诺莎和戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨等思想家的支持，他们认为某些真理可以独立于经验而被知晓。 理性主义的本质在于其主张人类拥有先天观念，并且逻辑推理可以引导我们揭示关于世界的普遍真理。例如，笛卡尔曾著名地说过：“我思故我在”，强调怀疑和理性在追求知识中的重要性。这句话概括了思考本身就是存在的证明，因此是进一步探讨现实本质的起点。 此外，理性主义鼓励个人批判性地质疑他们的信念和假设。通过依赖理性和逻辑，人们可以得出不是仅仅基于主观经验的结论，而是基于客观分析的结论。这种探究方法在数学和科学领域尤其重要，因为逻辑推导和理论框架通常会导致突破性的发现。 然而，理性主义并非没有批评者。经验主义者认为，我们对世界的理解根本上植根于我们的经验，而单靠理性无法提供完整的图景。他们主张，如果没有实证证据，任何理性结论可能缺乏有效性。这种理性主义与经验主义之间的辩论塑造了现代哲学的许多部分，并继续影响认识论——即知识的研究。 在当代社会，理性主义的原则可以在各个领域中观察到，从科学研究到伦理决策。例如，在科学事业中，研究人员提出假设，然后进行实验来测试这些想法。这个过程体现了理性主义的方法，因为它依赖于逻辑推理从可观察的数据中得出结论。此外，在伦理学中，个人经常参与理性讨论，以确定什么是对的或错的，通过逻辑框架权衡行为的后果。 尽管通过理性主义取得了许多进展，但必须认识到纯粹理性的局限性。情感、文化背景和个人经历在塑造人类理解和行为方面也扮演着重要角色。因此，结合理性思考和实证证据的平衡视角，可能会为复杂问题提供更全面的理解。 总之，理性主义仍然是一个基础概念，强调理性在获取知识中的重要性。尽管它有其局限性，但理性主义的原则继续影响着各个领域，鼓励批判性思维和逻辑分析。当我们在日益复杂的世界中航行时，接受理性主义的洞察，同时承认实证证据的价值，可能会导致对我们现实的更丰富、更细致的理解。