recriminate

简明释义

英[rɪˈkrɪmɪneɪt]美[rɪˈkrɪməˌneɪt]

v. 反责；反唇相讥

第 三 人 称 单 数 r e c r i m i n a t e s

现 在 分 词 r e c r i m i n a t i n g

过 去 式 r e c r i m i n a t e d

过 去 分 词 r e c r i m i n a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.During the argument, both sides began to recriminate each other, making it difficult to resolve the issue.

在争论中，双方开始相互指责，使得问题难以解决。

2.The investigation revealed that the two parties were quick to recriminate instead of finding a solution.

调查显示，这两个方面很快就开始互相指责而不是寻找解决方案。

3.In a heated debate, politicians often recriminate against each other's policies.

在激烈的辩论中，政治家们常常对彼此的政策进行指责。

4.After the scandal broke, the company executives started to recriminate each other to save their own reputations.

丑闻曝光后，公司高管们开始相互指责以挽救自己的声誉。

5.Instead of working together, they chose to recriminate and blame one another for the failure.

他们没有选择合作，而是选择了相互指责失败的原因。

作文

In the realm of human relationships, conflicts and disagreements are inevitable. Whether in a personal or professional context, misunderstandings can lead to heated arguments. Often, during these disputes, individuals may resort to blaming one another, which can escalate the situation further. This behavior is known as recrimination, or in simpler terms, the act of accusing someone in return. It is a common response when one feels attacked or wronged, but it rarely leads to a constructive resolution. Consider a scenario where two colleagues are working on a project together. If one fails to meet a deadline, the other might express frustration. Instead of addressing the issue calmly, the first colleague might respond with recrimination, pointing out past mistakes made by the other. This back-and-forth exchange of blame can create a toxic atmosphere, making it difficult for both parties to focus on finding a solution. Psychologically, recrimination stems from a defensive mechanism. When we feel cornered or criticized, our instinct is to protect ourselves by deflecting the blame. However, this does not resolve the underlying problem; instead, it often exacerbates it. In relationships, whether romantic or platonic, recrimination can lead to a breakdown in communication. Partners who engage in this behavior may find themselves stuck in a cycle of blame, which prevents them from addressing the root causes of their issues. To illustrate further, let’s take a look at a personal relationship. Imagine a couple arguing about finances. One partner accuses the other of being irresponsible with money. Rather than discussing the financial difficulties they face, the accused partner might retaliate with recrimination, highlighting the other’s spending habits. This cycle of blame can lead to resentment and distance, ultimately threatening the stability of the relationship. In contrast, healthy communication involves taking responsibility for one’s actions and focusing on solutions rather than blame. When individuals choose to avoid recrimination, they open the door to more productive discussions. By acknowledging their own mistakes and expressing their feelings without accusation, they can work together to overcome challenges. Moreover, in a broader context, recrimination can be observed in political debates and societal issues. When opposing sides engage in finger-pointing, it becomes challenging to reach a consensus or develop effective policies. Instead of collaborating to solve problems, they become entrenched in a cycle of blame that hinders progress. This phenomenon illustrates how recrimination can have far-reaching consequences beyond individual relationships. In conclusion, while the instinct to engage in recrimination is a natural human response, it is crucial to recognize its detrimental effects on relationships and communication. By fostering an environment of accountability and understanding, individuals can break free from the cycle of blame. Ultimately, choosing to communicate openly and constructively can lead to healthier relationships and more effective problem-solving, both personally and within society at large.

在人际关系的领域中，冲突和分歧是不可避免的。无论是在个人还是职业的背景下，误解都可能导致激烈的争吵。通常，在这些争端中，个人可能会相互指责，这可能会进一步升级局势。这种行为被称为反指责，简单来说，就是以同样的方式指责他人。当一个人感到被攻击或受到委屈时，这是一种常见的反应，但它很少导致建设性的解决方案。 想象一下两个同事一起合作一个项目的场景。如果一个人未能按时完成任务，另一个人可能会表示沮丧。第一位同事可能不会冷静地处理问题，而是用反指责来回应，指出另一方过去的错误。这种相互指责的交流可以创造出一种有毒的氛围，使双方都难以专注于寻找解决方案。 从心理学上讲，反指责源于一种防御机制。当我们感到被逼迫或受到批评时，我们的本能是通过转移责任来保护自己。然而，这并没有解决根本问题；相反，它往往使问题更加严重。在人际关系中，无论是浪漫关系还是友谊，反指责都可能导致沟通的崩溃。参与这种行为的伴侣可能会发现自己陷入指责的循环中，这阻止了他们解决根本问题。 为了进一步说明，让我们看一下个人关系。想象一对夫妇在争论财务问题。一方指责另一方在金钱上不负责任。与其冷静地讨论他们面临的财务困难，被指责的一方可能会用反指责来报复，强调另一方的消费习惯。这种指责的循环可能导致怨恨和距离，最终威胁到关系的稳定性。 相反，健康的沟通涉及对自己行为的负责，并关注解决方案而不是指责。当个人选择避免反指责时，他们为更具建设性的讨论打开了大门。通过承认自己的错误并表达自己的感受而不进行指责，他们可以共同努力克服挑战。 此外，在更广泛的背景下，反指责可以在政治辩论和社会问题中观察到。当对立双方进行相互指责时，达成共识或制定有效政策变得困难。相反，他们陷入指责的循环中，这阻碍了进展。这一现象说明了反指责如何在个人关系之外产生深远的影响。 总之，虽然参与反指责的本能是一种自然的人类反应，但认识到其对关系和沟通的有害影响至关重要。通过培养责任感和理解的环境，个人可以打破指责的循环。最终，选择开放和建设性的沟通可以导致更健康的关系和更有效的问题解决，无论是在个人层面还是在更广泛的社会中。