redskins

简明释义

英[ˈrɛdskɪnz]美[ˈrɛdˌskɪnz]

n. 红皮肤人；（旧称）美洲土著居民，印第安人（redskin 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The Washington Redskins Official Mobile App brings you the latest Redskins news, photos, videos, blogs, tweets, score and much more all right at the palm of your hand.

华盛顿红皮队官方移动应用程序，为您带来最新的红皮新闻，照片，视频，博客，微博，得分和在手掌更加所有权利。红皮更新直接从球队获取所有。

2.This afternoon the New York Giants mopped the floor with the Washington Redskins.

今天下午纽约巨人队把华盛顿红人队打得一败涂地。

3.Los Angeles Rams vs the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1980 - L.A. lost - and los Angeles Raiders vs. the Washington Redskins in 1984 -l.a. won.

1980年洛杉矶公羊队对匹兹堡钢人队，洛杉矶战败；1984年洛杉矶rai队对华盛顿红人队，洛杉矶胜。

4.Washington Redskins star safety Sean Taylor is in critical condition after being shot in the leg at his Florida home.

华盛顿红人队橄榄球明星SeanTaylor在佛罗里达的家中遭枪击，腿部受伤，目前情况严重。

5.The Redskins' offense is stronger than their defense.

印第安人队的进攻强于防守。

6.Redskins kicker Chip Lohmiller missed two field-goal attempts.

红皮肤的踢球者奇普·罗米勒错过了两次进球机会。

7.The term redskins refers to Native American people, but it is considered offensive by many.

术语redskins指的是美国土著人，但许多人认为它是冒犯性的。

8.Some sports teams have changed their names to avoid using the word redskins.

一些体育队已经更改了他们的名字，以避免使用词汇redskins。

9.The debate over the use of the name redskins in sports continues to be a hot topic.

在体育中使用名称redskins的争论仍然是一个热门话题。

10.Activists argue that the term redskins perpetuates negative stereotypes about Indigenous peoples.

活动家们认为，术语redskins延续了对土著人民的负面刻板印象。

11.In recent years, there has been a push to retire the name redskins from professional sports.

近年来，已经有呼声要求在职业体育中淘汰名称redskins。

作文

The term redskins has been a subject of intense debate and controversy in recent years. Historically, it was used to refer to Native Americans, particularly by European settlers. However, the term is now widely considered offensive and derogatory. In this essay, I will explore the origins of the term redskins, its implications in contemporary society, and the ongoing efforts to address and rectify its use. The word redskins can be traced back to the colonial era when European settlers used it to describe the indigenous peoples of North America. It was often employed in a derogatory manner, reinforcing stereotypes and perpetuating a narrative that dehumanized Native Americans. The term is believed to have originated from the skin color of some Native American tribes, but it is important to note that this generalization fails to accurately represent the diversity and complexity of Indigenous cultures. In modern times, the use of the term redskins has come under scrutiny. Many Native American activists and organizations have voiced their concerns about its continued usage, particularly in sports team names and mascots. For instance, the Washington NFL team faced significant backlash for retaining the name redskins until it was finally changed in 2020. This decision was seen as a victory for those advocating for the rights and dignity of Indigenous peoples. The implications of using the term redskins extend beyond mere semantics. It reflects a broader societal issue regarding how we view and treat marginalized communities. Language plays a crucial role in shaping perceptions, and using terms that are deemed offensive can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and foster division. By moving away from terms like redskins, we can begin to create a more inclusive and respectful dialogue about Indigenous peoples and their histories. Efforts to address the use of the term redskins have gained momentum in recent years, with many educational institutions, corporations, and sports organizations reevaluating their language and practices. This shift is part of a larger movement towards recognizing and respecting the rights of Indigenous peoples. Advocates argue that changing the language we use is a critical step in acknowledging historical injustices and promoting healing. Furthermore, the conversation surrounding the term redskins highlights the importance of listening to Indigenous voices. It is essential to engage with Native American communities and understand their perspectives on language and representation. By centering their experiences, we can foster a more nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and work towards meaningful change. In conclusion, the term redskins serves as a reminder of the complexities of language and its impact on society. While it may have been accepted in the past, its current connotations are deeply problematic and hurtful. As we move forward, it is crucial to be mindful of the words we use and their implications. By rejecting terms like redskins and embracing more respectful language, we can contribute to a more inclusive and equitable society for all individuals, regardless of their background. It is time to listen, learn, and change for the better.

“红皮肤人”这个词在近年来成为了激烈争论和争议的主题。历史上，它被用来指代美洲原住民，特别是欧洲定居者。然而，这个词现在被广泛认为是冒犯和贬义的。在这篇文章中，我将探讨“红皮肤人”一词的起源、其在当代社会中的影响，以及为解决和纠正其使用而进行的持续努力。 “红皮肤人”这个词可以追溯到殖民时代，当时欧洲定居者用它来描述北美的土著人民。它通常以贬义的方式使用，强化了刻板印象，并延续了一种去人性化的叙述。这个词据信源于一些土著部落的肤色，但重要的是要注意，这种概括未能准确代表土著文化的多样性和复杂性。 在现代，“红皮肤人”一词的使用受到了严格审查。许多美洲原住民活动家和组织对其继续使用表示担忧，尤其是在体育队名称和吉祥物中。例如，华盛顿NFL球队因保留“红皮肤人”这个名字而面临重大反对，直到2020年最终更名。这一决定被视为倡导土著人民权利和尊严的胜利。 使用“红皮肤人”一词的影响超出了单纯的语义问题。它反映了一个更广泛的社会问题，即我们如何看待和对待边缘化社区。语言在塑造观念方面发挥着关键作用，使用被认为是冒犯的术语可能会延续有害的刻板印象并加剧分裂。通过摆脱像“红皮肤人”这样的词汇，我们可以开始创造一个更具包容性和尊重的对话，关于土著人民及其历史。 近年来，针对“红皮肤人”一词的使用的努力不断增加，许多教育机构、企业和体育组织正在重新评估他们的语言和做法。这一转变是对承认和尊重土著人民权利的更大运动的一部分。倡导者认为，改变我们使用的语言是承认历史不公和促进愈合的重要一步。 此外，围绕“红皮肤人”一词的讨论强调了倾听土著声音的重要性。与美洲原住民社区互动，理解他们对语言和表现的观点至关重要。通过集中他们的经历，我们可以促进对当前问题的更细致的理解，并朝着有意义的变化努力。 总之，“红皮肤人”这个词提醒我们语言的复杂性及其对社会的影响。虽然在过去它可能被接受，但它目前的含义深具问题和伤害性。随着我们向前迈进，谨慎使用我们所用的词汇及其影响至关重要。通过拒绝像“红皮肤人”这样的词汇，拥抱更具尊重的语言，我们可以为所有人，无论其背景如何，贡献一个更加包容和公平的社会。是时候倾听、学习并为更好而改变。