reductionism

简明释义

英[rɪˈdʌkʃənɪzəm]美[rɪˈdʌkʃənɪzəm]

n. 还原论；简化论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Determinism controlled by reductionism is becoming self-deficient more and more visibly.

受简约论思想支配的决定论和还原论越来越显示出自身的先天不足。

2.In the later half of the 19th century, the main stream in physiology was mechanical reductionism.

19世纪下半叶，机械还原论主导生理学领域。

3.In discussions of Hayek's succession to Mach, the points stimulating to the Hayekian students consist mainly in four aspects: connectionism, reductionism, positivism and ontology.

在讨论哈耶克对马赫的继承关系时，研究者们一般感兴趣的问题有四个方面：关联主义、还原主义、实证主义和本体论。

4.Theoretic Reductionism is a positive guide line to promote science and a fundamental to achieve science′s unification;

理论还原论是促进科学进步的积极纲领，是实现科学统一的基本途径；

5.Reductionism and reduction method not only interrelate each other but also have essential differences.

还原论与还原方法既有联系又存在着质的差别。

6.Modern science and postmodern science respectively embody two different modes of thinking, that is, reductionism and holism.

现代科学和后现代科学分别体现的是还原论和整体论的思维方式。

7.Algorithmism asserts that phenomena and process of biosis are computable, and this assertion has gone on with Reductionism.

计算主义纲领关于生命现象或过程是可计算的主张，与关于生命现象的还原论是一脉相承的。

8.The theory of evolution is often criticized for its reductionism, as it simplifies complex biological processes to mere survival and reproduction.

进化论常常因其还原论而受到批评，因为它将复杂的生物过程简化为仅仅是生存和繁殖。

9.In psychology, some argue that reductionism fails to account for the complexities of human emotions and experiences.

在心理学中，一些人认为还原论未能考虑到人类情感和经历的复杂性。

10.The scientist's approach was criticized for its reductionism, as it ignored the interplay of environmental factors in the experiment.

这位科学家的方法因其还原论而受到批评，因为它忽视了实验中环境因素的相互作用。

11.Many philosophers debate the merits of reductionism in understanding consciousness.

许多哲学家讨论在理解意识时还原论的优缺点。

12.The film critiques the reductionism of societal issues to individual moral failings.

这部电影批评了将社会问题简化为个人道德失败的还原论。

作文

Reductionism is a philosophical approach that seeks to understand complex phenomena by breaking them down into their simpler components. This method has been widely applied in various fields, including science, psychology, and sociology. By analyzing individual parts, reductionism aims to provide clearer insights into the overall system. However, this approach has its limitations, often overlooking the interactions and relationships that exist between these components. In this essay, I will explore the concept of reductionism (还原论) and its implications in different domains. In the realm of science, reductionism (还原论) plays a crucial role in the study of biological systems. For instance, biologists often examine organisms at the molecular level to understand how they function. By studying DNA, proteins, and other cellular components, scientists can gain insights into the mechanisms of life. However, while this approach has led to significant discoveries, such as the structure of DNA, it can sometimes lead to an incomplete understanding of living organisms. For example, the behavior of a cell cannot be fully understood by merely analyzing its individual molecules; one must also consider the interactions and environmental factors affecting it. Similarly, in psychology, reductionism (还原论) is evident in the study of human behavior. Psychologists may attempt to explain complex emotions and behaviors by examining biological factors, such as neurotransmitters and hormones. While this biological perspective has provided valuable insights, it often neglects the social and cultural influences that shape human experiences. A purely reductionist view may lead to oversimplifications, ignoring the rich tapestry of human life that cannot be easily quantified or dissected. In sociology, reductionism (还原论) manifests in the analysis of social phenomena. Sociologists may focus on individual actions, economic factors, or demographic data to explain societal trends. While these analyses can yield useful information, they may fail to capture the intricate web of relationships and socio-cultural contexts that influence human behavior. Social issues, such as poverty or crime, cannot be fully understood by looking at individual factors alone; they require a holistic approach that considers the broader societal framework. Despite its limitations, reductionism (还原论) has sparked significant advancements in various fields. It encourages researchers to delve deeper into the fundamental aspects of their subjects, leading to groundbreaking discoveries. However, it is essential to recognize the importance of integrating multiple perspectives to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of complex systems. Interdisciplinary approaches that combine reductionist analysis with holistic viewpoints can provide a more nuanced understanding of phenomena. In conclusion, reductionism (还原论) serves as a valuable tool for understanding complexity by breaking it down into simpler parts. While it has proven effective in many scientific and academic disciplines, it is crucial to remain aware of its limitations. Emphasizing the interconnectedness of components within a system can lead to richer insights and a deeper appreciation for the complexities of life. As we continue to explore the intricacies of our world, a balanced approach that values both reductionist and holistic perspectives will be essential for fostering comprehensive knowledge and understanding.

还原论是一种哲学方法，旨在通过将复杂现象分解为更简单的组成部分来理解它们。这种方法在科学、心理学和社会学等多个领域得到了广泛应用。通过分析单个部分，还原论旨在提供对整体系统的更清晰洞察。然而，这种方法也有其局限性，往往忽视这些组件之间存在的相互作用和关系。在这篇文章中，我将探讨还原论（reductionism）的概念及其在不同领域的影响。 在科学领域，还原论（reductionism）在生物系统研究中发挥着至关重要的作用。例如，生物学家通常会从分子水平研究生物体，以了解它们的功能。通过研究DNA、蛋白质和其他细胞成分，科学家可以获得关于生命机制的见解。然而，尽管这种方法导致了重大发现，如DNA的结构，但有时它可能导致对生物体的不完整理解。例如，细胞的行为不能仅通过分析其单个分子来完全理解；还必须考虑影响它的相互作用和环境因素。 同样，在心理学中，还原论（reductionism）在对人类行为的研究中也很明显。心理学家可能试图通过检查生物因素（如神经递质和激素）来解释复杂的情感和行为。虽然这种生物学视角提供了有价值的见解，但它往往忽视了塑造人类经历的社会和文化影响。纯粹的还原主义观点可能导致过于简化，忽略了无法轻易量化或解剖的人类生活的丰富织锦。 在社会学中，还原论（reductionism）体现在对社会现象的分析中。社会学家可能专注于个体行为、经济因素或人口数据，以解释社会趋势。尽管这些分析可以产生有用的信息，但它们可能未能捕捉到影响人类行为的错综复杂的关系和社会文化背景。社会问题，如贫困或犯罪，不能仅通过观察个别因素来完全理解；它们需要一种整体的方法，考虑更广泛的社会框架。 尽管存在局限性，还原论（reductionism）在多个领域引发了重要进展。它鼓励研究人员深入探讨其主题的基本方面，从而导致开创性的发现。然而，认识到整合多种视角的重要性以实现对复杂系统的更全面理解也是至关重要的。结合还原性分析与整体观点的跨学科方法可以提供对现象更细致的理解。 总之，还原论（reductionism）作为理解复杂性的一种有价值工具，通过将其分解为更简单的部分。尽管它在许多科学和学术学科中被证明是有效的，但保持对其局限性的意识至关重要。强调系统内组件之间的相互关联性可以带来更丰富的见解，并更深入地欣赏生活的复杂性。在我们继续探索世界的复杂性时，重视还原主义和整体观点的平衡方法将对促进全面的知识和理解至关重要。