remilitarising

简明释义

英[ˌrɛmɪlɪtəˈraɪzɪŋ]美[ˌrɛmɪlɪtəˈraɪzɪŋ]

nWith a new regard to their northern areas, some of the eight Arctic countries are, in a modest way, remilitarising them. n nnECONOMIST: The melting north | Then

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The government announced plans for remilitarising 重新军事化 the border regions to enhance national security.

政府宣布计划对边境地区进行重新军事化以增强国家安全。

2.After years of disarmament, the country is now remilitarising 重新军事化 its forces in response to regional threats.

在多年裁军之后，该国现在因应地区威胁而进行重新军事化。

3.The remilitarising 重新军事化 of the area has raised concerns among neighboring countries.

该地区的重新军事化引发了邻国的担忧。

4.International observers are watching closely as the nation begins remilitarising 重新军事化 after a long period of peace.

国际观察者正在密切关注该国在经历长期和平后开始重新军事化的情况。

5.The remilitarising 重新军事化 of former military bases is part of a broader strategy to deter aggression.

前军事基地的重新军事化是遏制侵略的更广泛战略的一部分。

作文

In recent years, the term remilitarising has become increasingly relevant in discussions about global security and international relations. The process of remilitarising refers to the act of re-establishing military forces or capabilities in a nation that had previously demilitarized or reduced its military presence. This phenomenon can be observed in various regions around the world, often as a response to perceived threats or geopolitical changes. One prominent example of remilitarising is the situation in Eastern Europe, particularly concerning NATO and Russia. Following the end of the Cold War, many Eastern European countries reduced their military capacities, believing that the threat of conflict had diminished. However, with the resurgence of Russian aggression, particularly the annexation of Crimea in 2014, several nations have begun to remilitarise. This includes increasing defense budgets, enhancing military readiness, and participating in joint military exercises with NATO allies. The implications of remilitarising are significant. On one hand, it can serve as a deterrent against potential aggressors, signaling a nation's commitment to defend its sovereignty. On the other hand, it can also escalate tensions in already volatile regions. For instance, as countries in Eastern Europe bolster their military capabilities, Russia may respond by increasing its own military presence, leading to a cycle of escalation that could ultimately threaten regional stability. Another area where remilitarising is evident is in the Asia-Pacific region. Nations such as Japan and South Korea have historically maintained limited military forces due to post-World War II pacifist policies. However, with the rise of North Korea's nuclear capabilities and China's growing influence in the region, both countries are reconsidering their military strategies. Japan, for example, has been gradually remilitarising by increasing its defense budget and expanding its military role within regional security frameworks. The decision to remilitarise often comes with internal debates and concerns. Citizens may worry about the potential for increased militarization leading to conflicts or diverting resources from social programs. Governments must balance these concerns with the need for national security, often resulting in contentious political discussions. In some cases, public opinion may favor a more aggressive military posture, while in others, there may be strong opposition to remilitarising, advocating instead for diplomatic solutions. Internationally, remilitarising can also affect alliances and partnerships. Countries that choose to enhance their military capabilities may find themselves at odds with former allies who advocate for disarmament and peaceful resolutions. This can lead to shifts in alliances and create new geopolitical dynamics that complicate existing relationships. In conclusion, the concept of remilitarising is multifaceted and deeply intertwined with contemporary issues of security and diplomacy. As nations navigate the challenges of an increasingly complex global landscape, the decision to remilitarise will continue to have far-reaching consequences. Understanding this term and its implications is crucial for anyone interested in international relations and the future of global security. The balance between maintaining peace and ensuring national defense is a delicate one, and the process of remilitarising highlights the ongoing struggles faced by nations in a changing world.

近年来，术语remilitarising在全球安全和国际关系的讨论中变得越来越相关。remilitarising的过程是指在一个国家重新建立军事力量或能力，该国之前已经非军事化或减少了其军事存在。这种现象可以在世界各地的不同地区观察到，通常是对感知威胁或地缘政治变化的反应。
一个显著的remilitarising例子是东欧的情况，特别是涉及北约和俄罗斯。在冷战结束后，许多东欧国家减少了其军事能力，认为冲突的威胁已经减小。然而，随着俄罗斯侵略行为的复苏，特别是2014年克里米亚的吞并，几个国家开始重新remilitarise。这包括增加国防预算、提高军事准备状态以及与北约盟国进行联合军事演习。
remilitarising的影响是显著的。一方面，它可以作为潜在侵略者的威慑，向国家表明捍卫其主权的承诺。另一方面，它也可能加剧已经动荡不安地区的紧张局势。例如，随着东欧国家增强其军事能力，俄罗斯可能会通过增加自身的军事存在来作出回应，从而导致升级循环，这最终可能威胁到地区稳定。
另一个明显的remilitarising领域是亚太地区。日本和韩国等国家由于二战后的和平主义政策，历史上维持有限的军事力量。然而，随着朝鲜核能力的上升和中国在该地区影响力的增长，这两个国家正在重新考虑其军事战略。例如，日本通过增加国防预算和扩大其在地区安全框架内的军事角色，正在逐步remilitarising。
选择remilitarising的决定通常伴随着内部辩论和担忧。公民可能担心，军事化的增加会导致冲突或将资源从社会项目中转移。政府必须在这些担忧与国家安全需求之间取得平衡，通常导致有争议的政治讨论。在某些情况下，公众舆论可能支持更积极的军事姿态，而在其他情况下，可能强烈反对remilitarising，而主张外交解决方案。
在国际上，remilitarising还可能影响联盟和伙伴关系。选择增强军事能力的国家可能会与倡导裁军和和平解决方案的前盟友发生冲突。这可能导致联盟的变化，并创造出新的地缘政治动态，复杂化现有关系。
总之，remilitarising的概念是多方面的，与当代安全和外交问题密切相关。随着各国在日益复杂的全球环境中应对挑战，remilitarising的决定将继续产生深远的后果。理解这个术语及其含义对于任何对国际关系和全球安全的未来感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。维护和平与确保国家防御之间的平衡是微妙的，而remilitarising的过程突显了各国在变化的世界中面临的持续斗争。