reorganization

简明释义

英[riˌɔːɡənaɪˈzeɪʃ(ə)n]美[riˌɔːrɡənəˈzeɪʃn]

n. 改组；整顿；改编

复 数 r e o r g a n i z a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.DB2 10 also removes restrictions on the online reorganization of base table Spaces that use LOB columns.

DB 210还消除了对使用lob列的基表空间的在线重组限制。

2.Table scope: Identifies which tables are considered for automatic reorganization.

表范围：确定对哪些表执行自动重组。

3.Reorganization is necessary on the distributive side of this industry.

此行业的产品分配环节必需重组。

4.It also buys time, since no one expects a reorganization to be effective immediately.

它还同时赢得了时间，因为没人会期待一场重组起到立竿见影的效果。

5.Shanghai Bicycle Factory started off from the reorganization of a tractor factory.

一家拖拉机厂重组成为上海自行车厂。

6.Only consider user tables for automatic table reorganization.

仅对用户表进行自动表重组。

7.Deferred locking did not occur on a table which was executing an online table reorganization.

被推迟的锁不会发生在正在执行在线表重组的表上。

8.Frank Martino also applied a lesson from the IBM training to complete a staff reorganization.

弗兰克·马丁奴(FrankMartino)也通过运用IBM的培训课程完成了一次人员重组。

9.Tables whose estimated size is greater than the size criteria are not considered by automatic table reorganization.

自动表重组不会考虑那些表大小估计值大于大小条件的表。

10.The company's recent reorganization has led to a more efficient workflow.

公司的近期重组导致了更高效的工作流程。

11.After the reorganization, many employees were assigned new roles.

在重组后，许多员工被分配了新角色。

12.The reorganization of the department was necessary to improve communication.

部门的重组是改善沟通所必需的。

13.Investors were concerned about the impact of the reorganization on profits.

投资者对重组对利润的影响感到担忧。

14.The reorganization plan was approved by the board of directors.

该重组计划已获得董事会批准。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, businesses often face the necessity of change to remain competitive. One of the most significant changes a company can undergo is a reorganization, which refers to the process of restructuring an organization to improve efficiency, adapt to new market conditions, or respond to internal challenges. The concept of reorganization is not only applicable to businesses but also to non-profit organizations, educational institutions, and even government entities. Understanding the implications and processes involved in reorganization can provide valuable insights into organizational dynamics. A successful reorganization typically begins with a thorough assessment of the current structure and performance of the organization. This involves analyzing various factors such as employee roles, departmental functions, and overall productivity. For instance, a company may find that certain departments are overstaffed while others are under-resourced. By identifying these discrepancies, management can make informed decisions about how to allocate resources more effectively. Once the assessment is complete, the next step in the reorganization process is to outline a new organizational structure. This may involve redefining roles, merging departments, or even creating entirely new divisions. For example, a tech company might decide to merge its software development and quality assurance teams to enhance collaboration and streamline product development. This type of structural change can lead to improved communication and faster project completion times, ultimately benefiting the company's bottom line. However, reorganization is not solely about structural changes; it also requires a cultural shift within the organization. Employees must be engaged and informed throughout the process to ensure a smooth transition. Clear communication from leadership is essential to alleviate concerns and foster a sense of inclusion among staff members. When employees understand the reasons behind the reorganization and see how it aligns with the organization's goals, they are more likely to embrace the changes and contribute positively to the new structure. Moreover, the success of a reorganization can be measured by its impact on employee morale and productivity. If managed effectively, a reorganization can lead to increased job satisfaction as employees feel their contributions are valued in a more efficient system. On the other hand, poorly handled reorganization efforts can result in confusion, frustration, and a decline in productivity. Therefore, it is crucial for leaders to provide ongoing support and training to help employees navigate their new roles and responsibilities. In conclusion, reorganization is a vital strategy for organizations seeking to adapt and thrive in an ever-changing environment. By carefully assessing current structures, implementing thoughtful changes, and engaging employees throughout the process, organizations can transform challenges into opportunities for growth. As businesses continue to evolve, the ability to effectively manage reorganization will remain a key factor in achieving long-term success. Ultimately, understanding the complexities of reorganization equips leaders and employees alike to face the future with confidence and resilience.

在当今快节奏的世界中，企业常常面临变革的必要性，以保持竞争力。公司可以经历的最重要的变化之一是重组，即重新构建组织以提高效率、适应新的市场条件或应对内部挑战的过程。重组的概念不仅适用于企业，还适用于非营利组织、教育机构甚至政府实体。理解重组的影响和涉及的过程可以为组织动态提供宝贵的见解。 成功的重组通常始于对组织当前结构和绩效的全面评估。这涉及分析各种因素，如员工角色、部门职能和整体生产力。例如，一家公司可能发现某些部门人手过多，而其他部门则资源不足。通过识别这些差异，管理层可以就如何更有效地分配资源做出明智的决定。 一旦评估完成，重组过程的下一步是概述新的组织结构。这可能涉及重新定义角色、合并部门，甚至创建全新的部门。例如，一家科技公司可能决定合并其软件开发和质量保证团队，以增强协作并简化产品开发。这种结构变化可以改善沟通并加快项目完成时间，最终有利于公司的利润。 然而，重组不仅仅是结构变化；它还需要组织内部的文化转变。在整个过程中，员工必须参与并被告知，以确保平稳过渡。领导层的清晰沟通对于缓解担忧和培养员工的归属感至关重要。当员工了解重组背后的原因，并看到其与组织目标的对齐时，他们更有可能接受这些变化并积极贡献于新结构。 此外，重组的成功可以通过其对员工士气和生产力的影响来衡量。如果管理得当，重组可以提高工作满意度，因为员工会觉得他们的贡献在一个更高效的系统中得到了重视。另一方面，处理不当的重组努力可能导致混乱、挫折和生产力下降。因此，领导者为员工提供持续支持和培训，以帮助他们适应新的角色和责任至关重要。 总之，重组是组织寻求适应和在不断变化的环境中蓬勃发展的重要战略。通过仔细评估当前结构、实施深思熟虑的变更以及在整个过程中吸引员工，组织可以将挑战转变为增长的机会。随着企业的持续发展，有效管理重组的能力将仍然是实现长期成功的关键因素。最终，理解重组的复杂性使领导者和员工能够自信和韧性地面对未来。