retributive

简明释义

英[rɪˈtrɪbjətɪv]美[rɪˈtrɪbjətɪv]

adj. 报应的；惩罚的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The response to crime has gone through many methods such as retaliative punishment, deterrent punishment, retributive punishment, correctional punishment and eclectic punishment.

人类对犯罪的反应经历了报复刑、威慑刑、等价刑(报应刑)、矫正刑(教育刑)、折衷刑几种方式。

2.The response to crime has gone through many methods such as retaliative punishment, deterrent punishment, retributive punishment, correctional punishment and eclectic punishment.

人类对犯罪的反应经历了报复刑、威慑刑、等价刑(报应刑)、矫正刑(教育刑)、折衷刑几种方式。

3.By observing and studying the society that Hegel lived in and Hegel's experience, knowledge, status, etc, the readers can understand Hegel's legal retributive punishment better.

对黑格尔所处社会和黑格尔的经历、知识背景、社会地位等方面进行考察，为更好的理解其刑罚本质理论打下基础。

4.Reflecting on the scrape of the victims from the perspective of the retributive justice was the accelerating agent of the naissance of restorative justice.

恢复性司法理念的萌生，主要缘于对传统报复性司法中被害人处境的反思。

5.There may be black ingratitude in the thing, and the punishment may be retributive and well deserved; but, that it is a miserable thing, I can testify.

可以说这是一种昧良心的忘恩负义，惩罚是报应，是理所应得的，但不管怎样，我敢保证，这是一件很不幸的事情。

6.As a new model of dispute resolution, restorative justice is quite different from the traditional retributive justice.

恢复性司法作为一种新的纠纷解决模式，与传统的报应性司法截然不同。

7.This is the Karmic result of Retributive Actions(cause and Effect) that we have created in out past lives.

这是过去世所造的业因带来的果报。

8.He holds retributive punishment, while he is not against the punishment which had other aims.

他主张报应刑，但不反对刑罚另有目的。

9.Retributive punishment implies three value paradoxes.

报应刑隐含着三个价值悖论。

10.Retributive justice demands an eye for an eye.

报复型正义要求以眼还眼，以牙还牙。

11.The justice system must avoid being overly retributive 报复性的 in its approach to punishment.

司法系统在惩罚时必须避免过于报复性的做法。

12.Some argue that a retributive 报复性的 approach to crime does not deter future offenses.

有人认为，报复性的犯罪处理方式并不能阻止未来的犯罪。

13.The debate over retributive 报复性的 justice versus restorative justice is ongoing.

关于报复性的正义与修复性正义的辩论仍在继续。

14.Many believe that retributive 报复性的 justice creates more harm than good.

许多人认为，报复性的正义造成的伤害大于好处。

15.The prison system often reflects a retributive 报复性的 philosophy of punishment.

监狱系统通常反映出一种报复性的惩罚理念。

作文

In contemporary discussions about justice and morality, the term retributive justice often emerges as a focal point. 惩罚性正义是一种基于对罪行的报复和惩罚的理念，强调对不良行为的反应应该是相应的惩罚。这种观点认为，犯罪者应该为他们的行为承担责任，并受到相应的惩罚，以维护社会的道德秩序。对于许多人而言，retributive justice seems to provide a clear and straightforward approach to dealing with crime. However, it raises several important questions about its efficacy and moral implications. One of the primary arguments in favor of retributive justice is that it serves as a deterrent to potential criminals. The idea is that if individuals know they will face severe consequences for their actions, they may think twice before committing a crime. For example, harsh penalties for theft or violent crimes may discourage others from engaging in similar behaviors. This notion is rooted in the belief that people are rational actors who weigh the costs and benefits of their actions. By imposing strict punishments, society aims to create a sense of fear that prevents crime. However, critics of retributive justice argue that this approach is fundamentally flawed. They contend that it does not address the underlying causes of criminal behavior. Instead of focusing on punishment, they advocate for a more rehabilitative approach that seeks to understand why individuals commit crimes in the first place. Factors such as poverty, lack of education, and mental health issues can contribute to criminal behavior, and a purely retributive system may fail to address these root causes. As a result, offenders may be released back into society without any meaningful change in their circumstances, leading to a cycle of reoffending. Moreover, there is a growing concern that retributive justice disproportionately affects marginalized communities. Studies have shown that individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often receive harsher sentences compared to their wealthier counterparts for similar offenses. This disparity raises questions about fairness and equality within the justice system. If the primary goal of punishment is to achieve justice, then how can a system that perpetuates inequality be considered just? Additionally, the emotional aspect of retributive justice cannot be overlooked. Victims of crime often seek closure and a sense of justice through the punishment of the offender. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator. However, this emotional response can lead to a cycle of violence and retaliation that ultimately harms society as a whole. Instead of fostering healing and reconciliation, retributive justice may perpetuate animosity and division among individuals and communities. In conclusion, while retributive justice has its merits in providing a framework for accountability and deterrence, it also presents significant challenges and moral dilemmas. A balanced approach that incorporates elements of both retributive and restorative justice may offer a more effective solution. By addressing the root causes of crime, promoting rehabilitation, and ensuring fairness in sentencing, society can work towards a justice system that not only punishes wrongdoing but also fosters healing and reintegration. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a safer and more just society for all individuals, where the focus is not solely on punishment but on understanding and resolution.

在当代关于正义和道德的讨论中，术语惩罚性正义常常成为焦点。惩罚性正义是一种基于对罪行的报复和惩罚的理念，强调对不良行为的反应应该是相应的惩罚。这种观点认为，犯罪者应该为他们的行为承担责任，并受到相应的惩罚，以维护社会的道德秩序。对于许多人而言，惩罚性正义似乎提供了一种清晰而直接的方法来处理犯罪。然而，它引发了关于其有效性和道德影响的几个重要问题。 支持惩罚性正义的主要论点之一是，它可以作为潜在犯罪者的威慑。这个想法是，如果个人知道他们的行为将面临严厉的后果，他们可能会在犯罪前三思而后行。例如，对盗窃或暴力犯罪的严厉惩罚可能会阻止其他人参与类似的行为。这一观点植根于人们是理性行为者的信念，他们权衡自己行为的成本和收益。通过施加严格的惩罚，社会旨在创造一种恐惧感，从而防止犯罪。 然而，惩罚性正义的批评者认为，这种方法根本存在缺陷。他们主张，这并没有解决犯罪行为的根本原因。与其专注于惩罚，他们提倡一种更具康复性的方式，试图理解个体为何首先会犯罪。贫困、缺乏教育和心理健康问题等因素都可能导致犯罪行为，而纯粹的惩罚性体系可能无法解决这些根本原因。因此，罪犯可能在没有任何有意义的改变其环境的情况下被释放回社会，导致再犯的循环。 此外，人们越来越担心惩罚性正义对边缘化社区的影响。研究表明，来自较低社会经济背景的个人往往因类似罪行而受到比富裕同龄人更严厉的判罚。这种差异引发了关于公正和平等的问题。如果惩罚的主要目标是实现正义，那么一个延续不平等的系统怎么能被视为公正呢？ 此外，惩罚性正义的情感方面也不能被忽视。犯罪受害者通常通过对罪犯的惩罚寻求结束和正义。复仇的欲望可以成为一种强大的动机。然而，这种情感反应可能导致暴力和报复的循环，最终伤害整个社会。与其促进愈合与和解，惩罚性正义可能会加剧个体和社区之间的敌意与分裂。 总之，虽然惩罚性正义在提供问责和威慑的框架方面具有其优点，但它也带来了重大挑战和道德困境。一种结合惩罚性和恢复性正义元素的平衡方法可能提供更有效的解决方案。通过解决犯罪的根本原因，促进康复，并确保判刑的公正，社会可以朝着一个不仅惩罚错误行为而且促进愈合与重返社会的司法系统努力。最终，目标应该是为所有个体创造一个更安全、更公正的社会，关注的不仅仅是惩罚，而是理解与解决。