rigorism

简明释义

英[ˈrɪɡəˌrɪzəm]美[ˈrɪɡərˌɪzəm]

n. 严格主义；严格

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This seems to have been the case particularly in France and Italy; Germany probably suffered less from Rigorism.

这似乎已成为案件特别是在法国和意大利，德国，大概少遭受来自。

2.This seems to have been the case particularly in France and Italy; Germany probably suffered less from Rigorism.

这似乎已成为案件特别是在法国和意大利，德国，大概少遭受来自。

3.The teacher's approach was criticized for its rigorism, making it difficult for students to engage with the material.

这位老师的教学方法因其严格主义而受到批评，使学生难以与材料互动。

4.In philosophy, rigorism can lead to overly strict interpretations of moral principles.

在哲学中，严格主义可能导致对道德原则的过于严格的解释。

5.The company's policy reflects a sense of rigorism that prioritizes rules over employee well-being.

公司的政策反映了一种严格主义，优先考虑规则而非员工的福祉。

6.Some argue that rigorism in legal systems can undermine justice by being inflexible.

有人认为，在法律系统中的严格主义可能通过缺乏灵活性来破坏正义。

7.The debate about educational methods often centers around the issue of rigorism versus flexibility.

关于教育方法的辩论通常围绕严格主义与灵活性的问题展开。

作文

In today's society, the concept of ethics and morality often faces challenges from various perspectives. One such perspective is that of rigorism, which emphasizes strict adherence to moral rules and principles without consideration for the consequences. This approach can be both beneficial and detrimental, depending on the context in which it is applied. Understanding rigorism is essential for navigating complex moral dilemmas that arise in our lives. To illustrate the implications of rigorism, let us consider a scenario involving a medical professional faced with a difficult decision. Imagine a doctor who must choose between following a strict code of ethics that prohibits euthanasia and alleviating the suffering of a terminally ill patient who wishes to end their life. The rigorism approach would dictate that the doctor adhere to the ethical guidelines without exception, potentially prolonging the patient's pain and suffering. While this strict adherence to rules may stem from a place of moral integrity, it raises questions about the ultimate goal of those rules: to promote well-being and dignity. Conversely, a more flexible approach might allow the doctor to weigh the consequences of their actions against the rigid rules they are expected to follow. This could lead to a compassionate decision that prioritizes the patient's quality of life over strict compliance with ethical norms. Herein lies the tension between rigorism and consequentialism, where one focuses on the act itself and the other on the outcomes of that act. Moreover, rigorism can manifest in various aspects of life beyond medical ethics. In education, for instance, a rigid adherence to standardized testing and curriculum can stifle creativity and critical thinking among students. Educators who embrace rigorism may prioritize test scores over holistic learning experiences, ultimately hindering students' ability to engage with the material in meaningful ways. This raises an important question: should we not adapt our methods to better serve the needs of our students? Furthermore, in the realm of personal relationships, rigorism can lead to unrealistic expectations and a lack of empathy. Individuals who adhere strictly to their moral beliefs may find it challenging to accept differing viewpoints or lifestyles, creating barriers to understanding and connection. This rigidity can result in conflict and alienation, as people become entrenched in their positions rather than seeking common ground. Despite its drawbacks, rigorism does have its place in certain contexts. For example, in legal systems, strict adherence to laws is necessary to maintain order and justice. However, even within legal frameworks, there are often provisions for discretion and interpretation that allow for a balance between rigorism and compassion. In conclusion, while rigorism serves as a guiding principle for many ethical frameworks, it is crucial to recognize its limitations. Acknowledging the importance of context, consequences, and human experience can lead to more nuanced and compassionate decision-making. As we navigate the complexities of modern life, embracing a more flexible approach may ultimately foster greater understanding and harmony among individuals and communities. Therefore, it is essential to critically evaluate the role of rigorism in our lives and strive for a balance that honors both moral integrity and human compassion.

在当今社会，伦理和道德的概念常常面临来自各种角度的挑战。其中一个角度是rigorism，它强调严格遵循道德规则和原则，而不考虑后果。这种方法在不同的背景下应用时可能既有益又有害。理解rigorism对于应对我们生活中出现的复杂道德困境至关重要。 为了说明rigorism的影响，让我们考虑一个涉及医疗专业人员面临艰难决定的情景。想象一下，一个医生必须在遵循禁止安乐死的严格伦理规范与减轻一位希望结束自己生命的绝症患者痛苦之间做出选择。rigorism的方法会要求医生毫无例外地遵守伦理准则，这可能会延长患者的痛苦。尽管这种严格遵循规则可能源于道德诚信，但它引发了关于这些规则最终目标的问题：促进福祉和尊严。 相反，更灵活的方法可能允许医生在他们被期望遵循的严格规则与其行为后果之间权衡。这可能导致一个以患者的生活质量为重于对伦理规范的严格遵守的富有同情心的决定。在这里，rigorism与结果主义之间存在张力，一个专注于行为本身，另一个专注于该行为的结果。 此外，rigorism可以在生活的各个方面表现出来，超越医疗伦理。例如，在教育中，对标准化测试和课程的严格遵循可能抑制学生的创造力和批判性思维。坚持rigorism的教育者可能优先考虑考试成绩，而忽视全面的学习体验，最终妨碍学生以有意义的方式参与材料。这提出了一个重要问题：我们是否不应该调整我们的方法，以更好地服务于学生的需求？ 此外，在个人关系领域，rigorism可能导致不切实际的期望和缺乏同情心。严格遵循道德信仰的个体可能难以接受不同的观点或生活方式，从而造成理解和联系的障碍。这种刚性可能导致冲突和疏远，因为人们陷入自己的立场，而不是寻求共同点。 尽管存在缺点，rigorism在某些背景下确实有其存在的意义。例如，在法律体系中，严格遵循法律对于维护秩序和公正是必要的。然而，即使在法律框架内，通常也会有酌情权和解释的规定，允许在rigorism与同情心之间取得平衡。 总之，虽然rigorism作为许多伦理框架的指导原则，但至关重要的是认识到它的局限性。承认背景、后果和人类经验的重要性可以导致更细致和富有同情心的决策。在我们应对现代生活的复杂性时，拥抱更灵活的方法可能最终会促进个人和社区之间更大的理解与和谐。因此，批判性地评估rigorism在我们生活中的角色，并努力寻求一种同时尊重道德完整性和人类同情心的平衡是至关重要的。