rubrical

简明释义

英[ˈruːbrɪkəl]美[ˈrʊbrɪkl]

adj. 仪式指示的；朱色的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In 1955 Pope Pius XII authorized a rubrical revision, chiefly concerned with the calendar.

1955年，教皇庇护十二世授权对历法进行了一次修订。

2.In 1955 Pope Pius XII authorized a rubrical revision, chiefly concerned with the calendar.

1955年，教皇庇护十二世授权对历法进行了一次修订。

3.The teacher provided a detailed rubrical to help students understand the grading criteria.

老师提供了一个详细的评分标准，以帮助学生理解评分标准。

4.Using a rubrical can streamline the assessment process for educators.

使用评分标准可以简化教育工作者的评估过程。

5.The rubrical clearly outlined expectations for the project presentation.

该评分标准清楚地列出了项目演示的期望。

6.Students appreciated the rubrical as it made the assignment requirements transparent.

学生们很感激这个评分标准，因为它使作业要求变得透明。

7.The university developed a new rubrical for assessing online discussions.

大学制定了一份新的评分标准来评估在线讨论。

作文

In the realm of education, assessment plays a crucial role in determining student learning and performance. One of the most effective tools for assessment is the use of rubrics. A rubric is a scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses. It outlines specific expectations for an assignment by listing criteria and describing levels of quality from excellent to poor. In this context, the term rubrical refers to anything related to or characteristic of these scoring guides. Understanding rubrical assessments can significantly enhance both teaching and learning processes. The effectiveness of a rubrical assessment lies in its ability to provide clear guidelines for students. When students know what is expected of them, they are more likely to meet those expectations. For instance, a teacher may provide a rubrical that details the components of an essay: thesis statement, argument development, use of evidence, and grammar. Each component is assigned a point value, and descriptions of performance levels help students understand what constitutes a high-quality essay versus a mediocre one. This transparency not only aids students in their preparation but also fosters a sense of ownership over their learning. Moreover, rubrical assessments promote consistency and fairness in grading. When teachers utilize a rubrical, they have a structured framework that minimizes subjectivity in evaluation. This is particularly important in subjective subjects such as literature or art, where personal bias can influence grades. With a well-designed rubrical, all students are assessed against the same criteria, ensuring that each student's work is evaluated fairly and equitably. Another advantage of rubrical assessments is that they facilitate constructive feedback. Instead of simply giving a grade, teachers can refer to specific sections of the rubrical to explain why a student received a particular score. For example, a teacher might note that while a student's ideas were strong, the organization was lacking, as indicated by the rubrical. This targeted feedback allows students to understand their strengths and weaknesses, guiding them on how to improve in future assignments. Furthermore, the use of rubrical assessments encourages self-assessment and reflection among students. By familiarizing themselves with the rubrical, students can evaluate their own work before submission. This practice not only enhances their critical thinking skills but also empowers them to take responsibility for their learning. They learn to identify areas for improvement and set goals for future assignments, which can lead to greater academic success. In conclusion, the concept of rubrical assessments is integral to effective teaching and learning. By providing clear expectations, promoting fairness, facilitating constructive feedback, and encouraging self-reflection, rubrical assessments enhance the educational experience for both students and teachers. As education continues to evolve, embracing the principles of rubrical assessment will undoubtedly lead to improved outcomes and a deeper understanding of the learning process.

在教育领域，评估在确定学生学习和表现方面发挥着至关重要的作用。其中一种最有效的评估工具是使用评分标准（rubric）。评分标准是用于评估学生构建性回应质量的评分指南。它通过列出标准并描述从优秀到差的质量水平，概述了对作业的具体期望。在这种情况下，术语rubrical指的是与这些评分指南相关或特征的任何事物。理解rubrical评估可以显著增强教学和学习过程。 rubrical评估的有效性在于其能够为学生提供明确的指导。当学生知道他们被期望达到什么时，他们更有可能满足这些期望。例如，教师可以提供一个rubrical，详细说明论文的组成部分：论点陈述、论证发展、证据使用和语法。每个组成部分分配一个点值，表现水平的描述帮助学生理解什么构成高质量的论文与平庸论文之间的区别。这种透明度不仅有助于学生的准备，还培养了他们对自己学习的责任感。 此外，rubrical评估促进了评分的一致性和公平性。当教师利用rubrical时，他们拥有一个结构化的框架，最小化了评估中的主观性。这在文学或艺术等主观学科中尤为重要，因为个人偏见可能会影响成绩。通过设计良好的rubrical，所有学生都根据相同的标准进行评估，确保每位学生的作品得到公平和公正的评价。 rubrical评估的另一个优点是它们促进建设性反馈的提供。教师不仅仅给出一个分数，而是可以引用rubrical的特定部分来解释为什么学生获得了特定的分数。例如，教师可能会指出，尽管学生的想法很强，但组织结构不足，这在rubrical中得到了体现。这种针对性的反馈使学生能够理解自己的优缺点，指导他们在未来的作业中如何改进。 此外，使用rubrical评估鼓励学生进行自我评估和反思。通过熟悉rubrical，学生可以在提交之前评估自己的工作。这种做法不仅增强了他们的批判性思维能力，还使他们能够对自己的学习负责。他们学会识别需要改进的领域，并为未来的作业设定目标，这可能导致更大的学术成功。 总之，rubrical评估的概念对于有效的教学和学习至关重要。通过提供明确的期望、促进公平性、促进建设性反馈和鼓励自我反思，rubrical评估提升了学生和教师的教育体验。随着教育的不断发展，接受rubrical评估的原则无疑将导致更好的结果和对学习过程的更深刻理解。