rubrics

简明释义

英[ˈruːbrɪks]美[ˈruːbrɪks]

n. 评估准则；题目（rubric 的复数形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Libraries address so many different memory issues that it's difficult to compare them directly; common rubrics in the domain include garbage collection, smart Pointers, and smart containers.

库可以解决多种不同的内存问题，以致于直接对它们进行比较是非常困难的；这方面的常见主题包括垃圾收集、智能指针和智能容器。

2.Libraries address so many different memory issues that it's difficult to compare them directly; common rubrics in the domain include garbage collection, smart Pointers, and smart containers.

库可以解决多种不同的内存问题，以致于直接对它们进行比较是非常困难的；这方面的常见主题包括垃圾收集、智能指针和智能容器。

3.With Shanggao County cited for the case study, the article made a comparative analysis of the calculation of land economic coefficient based on Rubrics and Geostatistics.

论文以上高县为例，对“规程法”和“地统计学法”计算土地经济系数进行了比较分析。

4.The performance criterion and scoring rubrics play an important role in the education based on standard, so we should promote teaching and learning by applying the rules.

表现性准则和评价规则在基于标准的教育中具有重要的作用，应利用表现性准则和评价规则促进教学与学习。

5.After all, the 11-member admissions committee cannot necessarily rely on the rubrics it applies to American applications (which are challenging enough to sort through).

毕竟只有11名的遴选委员会一定不能使用应用于美国学生的申请程序，从中选择的确很具挑战性。

6.These images can be bound to one or more rubrics, accompanied by your comments, and can be rated.

这些图片可以按照你的注释和等级被归集到一个或者多个项目下面。

7.Rubrics An established set of criteria for rating students in all areas.

评价指引表建立一套各个领域评价学生的对照标准。

8.The teacher provided clear rubrics for the project to ensure students understand the grading criteria.

老师提供了明确的评分标准，以确保学生理解评分标准。

9.Using rubrics can help clarify expectations for both students and educators.

使用评分标准可以帮助澄清学生和教育工作者的期望。

10.The rubrics outlined specific elements that needed to be included in the essay.

该评分标准列出了论文中需要包含的具体元素。

11.Feedback based on rubrics allows students to improve their work systematically.

基于评分标准的反馈使学生能够系统地改进他们的作品。

12.In the art class, the rubrics emphasized creativity and originality.

在美术课上，评分标准强调创造力和独创性。

作文

In the realm of education, understanding how to assess student work is crucial for both teachers and students. One effective tool that has been widely adopted in various educational settings is the use of rubrics. A rubric, or 评分标准, is a scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses. It outlines specific criteria and levels of performance, providing a clear framework for assessment. This not only helps educators maintain consistency in grading but also gives students a better understanding of what is expected of them in their assignments. The importance of rubrics cannot be overstated. For teachers, rubrics serve as a valuable resource that streamlines the grading process. By having predefined criteria, teachers can quickly assess student work without having to rely on subjective judgment. This is particularly beneficial in large classes where time is of the essence. Moreover, rubrics help ensure that all students are evaluated fairly and consistently, which is vital for maintaining academic integrity. For students, rubrics provide clarity and transparency regarding how their work will be assessed. When students receive a rubric along with their assignment, they can see exactly what aspects of their work will be evaluated. This encourages them to focus on key elements such as organization, content, and creativity. Additionally, rubrics enable students to self-assess their work before submission, promoting a sense of ownership over their learning process. Furthermore, rubrics can be used to foster constructive feedback between peers. In collaborative learning environments, students can utilize rubrics to assess each other's work, allowing for meaningful discussions about strengths and areas for improvement. This peer review process not only enhances critical thinking skills but also builds a supportive learning community. However, it is essential to note that the effectiveness of rubrics largely depends on how well they are designed. A good rubric should be specific, measurable, and aligned with learning objectives. It should clearly define performance levels, from excellent to poor, and include descriptive language that guides both the evaluator and the student. When rubrics are vague or overly complicated, they can lead to confusion and frustration for both parties involved. In conclusion, rubrics play a pivotal role in the educational assessment landscape. They not only assist teachers in providing fair and consistent evaluations but also empower students by clarifying expectations and encouraging self-reflection. As educators continue to seek innovative ways to enhance teaching and learning, the thoughtful implementation of rubrics will undoubtedly remain a key strategy for fostering academic success. Therefore, embracing the use of rubrics can significantly improve the overall educational experience for both teachers and students alike.

在教育领域，理解如何评估学生的作品对教师和学生都至关重要。一种有效的工具是广泛采用的评分标准。评分标准是用于评估学生构建响应质量的评分指南。它概述了特定的标准和表现水平，为评估提供了明确的框架。这不仅帮助教育者在评分时保持一致性，还让学生更好地理解他们在作业中所期望的内容。 评分标准的重要性不容小觑。对于教师来说，评分标准是简化评分过程的宝贵资源。通过拥有预定义的标准，教师可以快速评估学生的作品，而无需依赖主观判断。这在大型课堂中尤为有益，因为时间至关重要。此外，评分标准帮助确保所有学生得到公平和一致的评估，这对维护学术诚信至关重要。 对于学生来说，评分标准提供了有关其作品将如何被评估的清晰度和透明度。当学生在作业中收到评分标准时，他们可以看到评估他们工作的具体方面。这鼓励他们关注诸如组织、内容和创造力等关键元素。此外，评分标准使学生能够在提交前自我评估他们的工作，促进了对学习过程的责任感。 此外，评分标准可以用于促进同伴之间的建设性反馈。在协作学习环境中，学生可以利用评分标准来评估彼此的作品，从而进行关于优点和改进领域的有意义讨论。这一同伴评审过程不仅增强了批判性思维能力，还建立了支持性的学习社区。 然而，必须注意的是，评分标准的有效性在很大程度上取决于其设计的好坏。好的评分标准应该是具体的、可测量的，并与学习目标一致。它应清楚地定义表现水平，从优秀到差劲，并包含指导评估者和学生的描述性语言。当评分标准模糊或过于复杂时，可能会导致双方的困惑和挫败感。 总之，评分标准在教育评估领域发挥着关键作用。它们不仅帮助教师提供公平和一致的评估，还通过澄清期望和鼓励自我反思来赋予学生权力。随着教育者继续寻求创新的方法来增强教学和学习，评分标准的深思熟虑的实施无疑将成为促进学术成功的关键策略。因此，接受使用评分标准可以显著改善教师和学生的整体教育体验。