ruling

简明释义

英[ˈruːlɪŋ]美[ˈruːlɪŋ]

n. （尤指法庭的）裁决，裁定；统治，支配

adj. 统治的，支配的；（热情或感情）占支配地位的，最强烈的 ；流行的，普遍的

v. 统治，支配；控制，操纵；裁定，判决（rule 的现在分词形式）

复 数 r u l i n g s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.What it will do is create a whole new ruling class.

它要做的就是创造一个全新的统治阶级。

2.Because the 1972 EEOC ruling was contested in court, the ruling won press attention that popularized maternity-leave policies.

由于1972年平等就业机会委员会的裁决在法庭上受到质疑，因此该裁决赢得了媒体的关注，从而普及了产假政策。

3.He died in 1985 after ruling Albania with an iron fist for 40 years.

他用铁腕统治了阿尔巴尼亚40年后，于1985年去世。

4.Privatization could become a political albatross for the ruling party.

私有化可能会成为执政党的政治包袱。

5.Goodwin tried to have the court ruling overturned.

古德温试图推翻法院的裁决。

6.Their ruling passion is that of carnal love.

他们的主导激情源于肉欲之爱。

7.Egypt and Babylon were both tyrannies, one very powerful man ruling over helpless masses.

埃及和巴比伦都实行专政，一个很有权势的人统治着无助的人民。

8.She is one of the ruling party's most outspoken critics.

她是最直言不讳地批评执政党的一个人。

9.That ruling comes as a blow to environmentalists.

那项规定对环境保护主义者是一个打击。

10.The court's ruling is final and must be obeyed.

法庭的裁决是最终的，必须遵守。

11.After much deliberation, the jury reached a ruling on the case.

经过深思熟虑，陪审团对案件作出了裁决。

12.The government issued a ruling to regulate online businesses.

政府发布了一项裁决以规范在线商业。

13.Her ruling as the judge was met with mixed reactions from the public.

作为法官，她的裁决引起了公众的不同反应。

14.The ruling from the appellate court overturned the previous decision.

上诉法院的裁决推翻了之前的决定。

作文

In today's world, the concept of ruling (统治) is more relevant than ever. From governments to organizations, the way power is exercised can significantly impact the lives of individuals and communities. The ruling (统治) authorities have the responsibility to ensure justice, equality, and the well-being of their citizens. However, history has shown us that not all ruling (统治) powers act in the best interest of the people they govern. This essay will explore the different dimensions of ruling (统治), its implications, and the importance of accountability in leadership. Firstly, it is essential to understand the various forms of ruling (统治) structures that exist around the world. Democratic systems, for instance, are characterized by the participation of citizens in the decision-making process. In these systems, leaders are elected, and their ruling (统治) authority is derived from the consent of the governed. On the other hand, authoritarian regimes often rely on coercion and repression to maintain power. In such cases, the ruling (统治) elite may prioritize their interests over those of the general populace, leading to widespread discontent and social unrest. The implications of ruling (统治) decisions can be profound. A government’s policies regarding education, healthcare, and economic development directly affect the quality of life for its citizens. For example, a ruling (统治) body that prioritizes funding for public education can lead to a more informed and skilled workforce, ultimately benefiting the economy. Conversely, neglecting these areas can result in long-term detrimental effects on society, such as increased poverty and crime rates. Moreover, the concept of ruling (统治) extends beyond mere governance. It encompasses the ethical responsibilities that come with power. Leaders must recognize that their ruling (统治) authority comes with the obligation to serve the greater good. This means making decisions that are not only beneficial in the short term but also sustainable in the long run. Transparency and accountability are crucial in this regard. When ruling (统治) authorities are held accountable for their actions, it fosters trust and cooperation among the populace. In recent years, we have witnessed a growing demand for accountability in ruling (统治). Social movements and protests around the world have highlighted the need for change in how leaders exercise their power. Citizens are increasingly unwilling to accept corrupt or ineffective ruling (统治) practices. This shift is a positive sign, indicating that people are becoming more aware of their rights and the importance of active participation in governance. In conclusion, the concept of ruling (统治) is multifaceted and deeply intertwined with the principles of justice and accountability. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, it is imperative that those in power remember their responsibilities to the people they serve. By fostering an environment of transparency and encouraging citizen engagement, we can create a society where ruling (统治) is synonymous with fairness and progress. Ultimately, the effectiveness of any ruling (统治) body lies in its ability to balance authority with responsibility, ensuring that the needs of the many are prioritized over the whims of the few.

在当今世界，“ruling（统治）”的概念比以往任何时候都更加相关。从政府到组织，权力的行使方式可以显著影响个人和社区的生活。ruling（统治）当局有责任确保公正、平等和公民的福祉。然而，历史告诉我们，并非所有的ruling（统治）权力都以其治理的人民的最佳利益为重。本文将探讨ruling（统治）的不同层面、其影响及领导责任的重要性。 首先，了解世界上存在的各种ruling（统治）结构形式至关重要。例如，民主制度的特点是公民参与决策过程。在这些系统中，领导者是通过选举产生的，他们的ruling（统治）权威源于被治理者的同意。另一方面，专制政权通常依靠强制和压制来维持权力。在这种情况下，ruling（统治）精英可能会优先考虑他们自己的利益，而不是普通民众的利益，导致广泛的不满和社会动荡。 ruling（统治）决策的影响可能是深远的。政府在教育、医疗和经济发展方面的政策直接影响公民的生活质量。例如，一个优先考虑公共教育资金的ruling（统治）机构可以培养出更高素质和技能的劳动力，从而最终惠及经济。相反，忽视这些领域可能导致对社会的长期不利影响，例如贫困和犯罪率的上升。 此外，ruling（统治）的概念不仅限于治理。它还包括与权力相关的道德责任。领导者必须认识到，他们的ruling（统治）权威伴随着服务于更大利益的义务。这意味着做出不仅在短期内有利，而且在长期内可持续的决策。在这方面，透明度和问责制至关重要。当ruling（统治）当局对其行为负责时，会促进公众之间的信任与合作。 近年来，我们目睹了对ruling（统治）问责制日益增长的需求。世界各地的社会运动和抗议活动突显了对领导者行使权力方式变革的需求。公民越来越不愿接受腐败或无效的ruling（统治）做法。这一转变是一个积极的信号，表明人们对自身权利和积极参与治理的重要性变得更加意识。 总之，ruling（统治）的概念是多方面的，与公正和问责的原则密切相关。在我们应对现代治理的复杂性时，权力者必须记住他们对所服务人民的责任。通过营造透明的环境并鼓励公民参与，我们可以创造一个ruling（统治）与公平和进步同义的社会。最终，任何ruling（统治）机构的有效性在于其平衡权威与责任的能力，确保多数人的需求优先于少数人的任性。