sacrilegious

简明释义

英[ˌsækrəˈlɪdʒəs]美[ˌsækrəˈlɪdʒəs]

adj. 该受天谴的，亵渎神明的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A number of churches were looted and sacrilegious acts committed.

许多教堂被洗劫了，还发生了亵渎行为。

2.We suggested "A. M. "; and after some hesitation, for my friend thought it perhaps sacrilegious, the slogan "A. M. ! Amen! "

我们提议叫“A.M。”，因为我朋友害怕这样会渎神，所以一番犹豫之后，才给出广告语：“A.M。！阿门！”

3.In a business culture that imposes the oppressive rule of mandatory replies, that kind ostentatious declaration may seem sacrilegious, rude or professionally suicidal.

在规定了强制性回复邮件的商业文化中，上面那种“嚣张”的声明看起来简直是又粗鲁，又亵渎职场，甚至是职场自绝行为。

4.Get down from this throne. This is sacrilegious, you don't pay any respect to the Master.

赶快从宝座上下来，这是大不敬的，这样做对你的师父不尊敬。

5.Many of his actions, contrary to all tradition, seemed sacrilegious to the people.

他的很多行为都与传统相反，别人眼中看上去是亵渎神灵。

6.No, Emmanuel, I am but a man, and your admiration is as unmerited as your words are sacrilegious.

不，艾曼纽，我只是一个人，你的赞扬不当，你的话是亵渎神明的。

7.My suggestion was sacrilegious because automakers have long been secretive about design.

我的建议非常的前卫，因为汽车制造商一直在进行偷偷摸摸的设计工作。

8.In a business culture that imposes the oppressive rule of mandatory replies, that kind ostentatious declaration may seem sacrilegious, rude or professionally suicidal.

在规定了强制性回复邮件的商业文化中，上面那种“嚣张”的声明看起来简直是又粗鲁，又亵渎职场，甚至是职场自绝行为。

9.Many people found the artist's depiction of religious figures in a modern context to be sacrilegious.

许多人认为艺术家以现代背景描绘宗教人物是亵渎神明的。

10.The film was criticized for its sacrilegious portrayal of sacred texts.

这部电影因其对神圣文本的亵渎表现而受到批评。

11.He was accused of sacrilegious behavior after vandalizing a church.

他因破坏教堂而被指控为亵渎行为。

12.The use of religious symbols in advertising can sometimes be seen as sacrilegious.

在广告中使用宗教符号有时会被视为亵渎。

13.Her sacrilegious comments about the holy site shocked the community.

她对圣地的亵渎言论震惊了社区。

作文

In today's society, we often encounter various forms of expression that challenge traditional beliefs and values. One such form is art, which can sometimes be viewed as sacrilegious (亵渎神明的). The term sacrilegious refers to actions or expressions that violate or show disrespect towards sacred things, particularly in a religious context. This essay explores the concept of sacrilegious art, its implications, and the debates surrounding it. Art has always been a medium for personal expression and societal commentary. Artists often push boundaries to provoke thought and discussion. However, when an artist chooses to depict religious figures or symbols in a way that some may find offensive, the artwork may be labeled as sacrilegious. For instance, a painting that portrays a revered religious leader in a compromising position could spark outrage among followers of that faith. This reaction stems from a deep-seated belief that certain subjects should be treated with reverence and respect. The controversy surrounding sacrilegious art raises important questions about freedom of expression versus the right to protect one's beliefs. On one hand, artists argue that their work is a reflection of their personal experiences and societal observations. They assert that art should not be censored, as it plays a crucial role in challenging norms and stimulating dialogue. For them, labeling their work as sacrilegious can feel like an infringement on their creative freedom. On the other hand, those who view such art as sacrilegious often feel that their beliefs are under attack. They argue that art has the power to influence public perception and can perpetuate harmful stereotypes or disrespect towards their faith. This tension between artistic freedom and religious sensitivity is a recurring theme in discussions about sacrilegious expressions. One notable example of sacrilegious art is Andres Serrano's photograph "Piss Christ," which depicts a crucifix submerged in urine. This piece sparked widespread outrage upon its release, with many claiming it was a direct affront to Christianity. Supporters of Serrano defended the artwork as a provocative commentary on the commercialization of religion and the loss of spiritual significance in contemporary society. This incident illustrates how the interpretation of art can vary drastically based on individual beliefs and cultural backgrounds. Moreover, the impact of sacrilegious art extends beyond the art world; it can affect social dynamics and community relationships. In some cases, it can lead to protests, boycotts, or even violence. The backlash against sacrilegious works can create divisions within communities, as individuals align themselves with either the artist's perspective or the offended group's stance. This polarization highlights the delicate balance that must be maintained when discussing topics that touch upon deeply held beliefs. In conclusion, the concept of sacrilegious art serves as a powerful reminder of the complexities surrounding freedom of expression and religious sensitivity. While artists have the right to explore controversial themes, it is essential to recognize the potential impact their work can have on various audiences. Engaging in open dialogue about the nature of sacrilegious expressions can foster understanding and respect, allowing for a more nuanced appreciation of art in all its forms. Ultimately, navigating the realm of sacrilegious art requires a careful consideration of both the artist's intent and the audience's interpretation, paving the way for thoughtful discussions about the intersection of creativity and belief.

在当今社会，我们常常遇到各种挑战传统信仰和价值观的表达形式。其中一种形式是艺术，有时被视为亵渎神明的。这个词亵渎神明的指的是违反或表现出对神圣事物的不尊重的行为或表达，特别是在宗教背景下。本文探讨了亵渎神明的艺术、其含义以及围绕它的争论。 艺术一直是个人表达和社会评论的媒介。艺术家们常常突破界限，以激发思考和讨论。然而，当艺术家选择以某种可能令一些人感到冒犯的方式描绘宗教人物或符号时，这件艺术作品可能会被贴上亵渎神明的标签。例如，一幅描绘受人尊敬的宗教领袖处于妥协位置的画作可能会引发信徒的愤怒。这种反应源于一种深植于心的信念，即某些主题应受到崇敬和尊重。 围绕亵渎神明的艺术的争议引发了关于言论自由与保护信仰权利的重要问题。一方面，艺术家们辩称他们的作品反映了个人经历和社会观察。他们主张，艺术不应受到审查，因为它在挑战规范和刺激对话中发挥着至关重要的作用。对他们来说，将他们的作品标记为亵渎神明的可能会让他们感到创作自由受到侵犯。 另一方面，那些认为这种艺术是亵渎神明的的人常常感到他们的信仰受到攻击。他们辩称，艺术具有影响公众认知的力量，并可能延续对他们信仰的不尊重或有害的刻板印象。这种艺术自由与宗教敏感性之间的紧张关系是关于亵渎神明的表达讨论中的一个反复出现的主题。 一个显著的亵渎神明的艺术例子是安德烈斯·塞拉诺的摄影作品《尿液中的基督》，该作品描绘了一根浸泡在尿液中的十字架。这件作品发布时引发了广泛的愤怒，许多人声称这直接冒犯了基督教。塞拉诺的支持者为这件艺术作品辩护，认为它是对宗教商品化和当代社会精神意义丧失的挑衅性评论。这一事件说明了艺术的解读如何因个人信仰和文化背景而大相径庭。 此外，亵渎神明的艺术的影响超越了艺术界；它可以影响社会动态和社区关系。在某些情况下，它可能导致抗议、抵制甚至暴力。对亵渎神明的作品的反击可能在社区内造成分裂，因为个人会将自己与艺术家的观点或受冒犯群体的立场对齐。这种两极分化突显了在讨论涉及深层信仰的话题时必须保持的微妙平衡。 总之，亵渎神明的艺术概念有力地提醒我们关于言论自由与宗教敏感性之间的复杂性。虽然艺术家有权探索争议性主题，但必须认识到他们的作品对不同受众的潜在影响。就亵渎神明的表达进行公开对话可以促进理解和尊重，从而使我们对各种形式的艺术有更细致的欣赏。最终，驾驭亵渎神明的艺术领域需要对艺术家的意图和观众的解读进行仔细考虑，为关于创造力与信仰交汇点的深思熟虑的讨论铺平道路。