schlock

简明释义

英[ʃlɒk]美[ʃlɑːk]

n. 伪劣品；次品

adj. 低劣的；廉价的（等于 shlock）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It does, after all, keep them from focusing on the scant musical offerings of the past year a dismal period in terms of new creative genius, or even mildly original schlock.

这种情况确实使他们无法认真关注过去一年中本来场次就很少的音乐演出。这一年是暗淡的一年，既没有出现新的、有创造力的天才，甚至连差强人意、稍微有点独创性的音乐次品都没有。

2.It does, after all, keep them from focusing on the scant musical offerings of the past year a dismal period in terms of new creative genius, or even mildly original schlock.

这种情况确实使他们无法认真关注过去一年中本来场次就很少的音乐演出。这一年是暗淡的一年，既没有出现新的、有创造力的天才，甚至连差强人意、稍微有点独创性的音乐次品都没有。

3.Mr Lucas calls them "schlock economics", contrived to justify Mr Obama's projections for the budget deficit.

Lucas先生称他们“蹩脚的经济学家”，只是设法证明奥巴马先生的赤字预算有正当理由。

4.Be careful, don't buy a schlock car with a pretty design.

小心，不要买品质差造型美的车。

5.The film is a piece of schlock.

这是一部粗制滥造的电影片子。

6.The movie was nothing but schlock, filled with bad acting and cliché plots.

这部电影简直就是低劣的作品，充满了糟糕的表演和陈词滥调的情节。

7.She refused to buy that schlock furniture from the discount store.

她拒绝从折扣店购买那些劣质家具。

8.The novel was criticized for being schlock romance with unrealistic characters.

这部小说因其不切实际的人物而被批评为低俗的爱情故事。

9.He has a collection of old schlock horror films that are so bad they're good.

他收藏了一些老旧的劣质恐怖片，糟糕到好笑。

10.The restaurant served schlock food that was neither tasty nor healthy.

这家餐厅提供的食物是低劣的食物，既不好吃也不健康。

作文

In the world of entertainment and consumer goods, the term schlock refers to items that are of low quality or considered to be cheap and tasteless. This word is often used to describe movies, books, or products that lack artistic value or substance, yet manage to attract attention and sales due to their sensationalism or gimmicky nature. The prevalence of schlock in our society raises questions about taste, marketing strategies, and the impact of consumer culture on creativity. When we think of schlock, we might picture a low-budget horror film filled with clichés and poor acting. These films often rely on shock value rather than storytelling or character development. Despite their shortcomings, such movies can achieve cult followings and sometimes even become beloved for their campiness. This phenomenon illustrates how schlock can transcend its initial lack of quality to become a source of entertainment and nostalgia for many viewers. The rise of schlock is not limited to film; it can also be found in literature and other forms of art. For example, certain genres of fiction, like romance novels or thrillers, may be criticized for their formulaic plots and predictable endings. However, these works often sell exceptionally well, appealing to readers looking for escapism rather than literary merit. This raises an important question: Is there value in schlock? Can something be enjoyable even if it lacks depth? Moreover, the consumer market is flooded with schlock products that prioritize profit over quality. Fast fashion, for instance, offers trendy clothing at low prices, but often at the cost of ethical production and durability. These items may be appealing in the short term, but they contribute to environmental degradation and a culture of disposability. The allure of schlock can lead consumers to prioritize immediate gratification over long-term satisfaction and sustainability. On the other hand, the existence of schlock serves as a counterpoint to high art and premium products. It reminds us that not all art needs to be profound or serious; sometimes, entertainment can simply be fun. The dichotomy between high culture and schlock challenges our perceptions of what constitutes value in art and consumer goods. It encourages us to explore a wider range of experiences and appreciate different forms of expression, even if they are not traditionally celebrated. In conclusion, while schlock may initially seem like a derogatory term, it opens up a broader conversation about quality, taste, and the role of art in society. Whether it's a cheesy movie, a formulaic book, or a poorly made product, schlock has its place in our cultural landscape. Embracing the concept of schlock allows us to recognize the diversity of human creativity and the various ways we seek entertainment and connection in our lives. Ultimately, it serves as a reminder that not everything needs to be serious or highbrow to have value; sometimes, we just need a little bit of fun.

在娱乐和消费品的世界中，术语schlock指的是低质量或被认为便宜且无品味的物品。这个词通常用来形容那些缺乏艺术价值或实质内容的电影、书籍或产品，但由于其耸人听闻或花招而吸引了关注和销售。schlock在我们社会中的普遍存在引发了关于品味、营销策略以及消费文化对创意影响的问题。 当我们想到schlock时，可能会想象一部充满陈词滥调和拙劣表演的低预算恐怖片。这些电影往往依赖于冲击价值，而不是叙事或角色发展。尽管它们存在缺陷，这类电影有时能获得邪教般的追随者，并因其低俗而受到喜爱。这种现象说明了schlock如何超越其最初的低质量，成为许多观众怀旧和娱乐的来源。 schlock的兴起不仅限于电影；它也可以在文学和其他艺术形式中找到。例如，某些类型的小说，如浪漫小说或惊悚小说，可能因其公式化的情节和可预测的结局而受到批评。然而，这些作品往往销售极佳，吸引寻求逃避现实的读者，而非追求文学价值。这提出了一个重要问题：schlock是否有价值？即使缺乏深度，某些东西是否仍然可以令人愉悦？ 此外，消费市场充斥着优先考虑利润而非质量的schlock产品。例如，快时尚提供价格低廉的时尚服装，但往往以牺牲道德生产和耐用性为代价。这些商品在短期内可能很有吸引力，但它们助长了环境恶化和一次性文化。schlock的诱惑可能导致消费者优先考虑即时满足，而不是长期满意和可持续性。 另一方面，schlock的存在作为高雅艺术和优质产品的对立面。它提醒我们，并非所有艺术都需要深刻或严肃；有时，娱乐仅仅是乐趣。高文化与schlock之间的二元对立挑战了我们对艺术和消费品价值的看法。它鼓励我们探索更广泛的体验，欣赏不同形式的表达，即使它们并不被传统庆祝。 总之，虽然schlock最初似乎是一个贬义词，但它开启了关于质量、品味和艺术在社会中角色的更广泛对话。无论是低劣的电影、公式化的书籍，还是制作粗糙的产品，schlock在我们的文化景观中都有其位置。接受schlock的概念使我们能够认识到人类创造力的多样性，以及我们在生活中寻求娱乐和联系的各种方式。最终，它提醒我们，并非所有事物都需要严肃或高雅才能具有价值；有时，我们只需要一点乐趣。