sciolistic

简明释义

英[ˌsaɪəˈlɪstɪk]美[ˌsaɪəˈlɪstɪk]

adj. 一知半解的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.His arguments were often dismissed as sciolistic 肤浅的, lacking depth and thorough research.

他的论点常常被视为sciolistic 肤浅的，缺乏深度和彻底的研究。

2.The professor criticized the sciolistic 肤浅的 interpretations of the text presented by the students.

教授批评学生们对文本的解读过于sciolistic 肤浅的。

3.Many articles online are filled with sciolistic 肤浅的 information that can mislead readers.

许多在线文章充满了sciolistic 肤浅的信息，可能会误导读者。

4.Her sciolistic 肤浅的 knowledge about the subject made it difficult for her to engage in meaningful discussions.

她对这个主题的sciolistic 肤浅的知识使她很难参与有意义的讨论。

5.The documentary was criticized for its sciolistic 肤浅的 approach to complex social issues.

这部纪录片因其对复杂社会问题的sciolistic 肤浅的处理而受到批评。

作文

In today’s fast-paced world, the pursuit of knowledge has become a common endeavor among individuals. However, not everyone who claims to be knowledgeable truly possesses deep understanding. This phenomenon can be described as sciolistic, which refers to a superficial or pretentious display of knowledge without genuine comprehension. It is essential to recognize the difference between being informed and being truly knowledgeable, as the former can often lead to misunderstandings and misconceptions. Consider the impact of social media on our perception of knowledge. With the rise of platforms like Twitter and Instagram, many people share opinions and information at an alarming rate. While this can foster discussions and spread awareness, it also encourages sciolistic behavior. Individuals may post articles or quotes without fully grasping their content, leading to a diluted understanding of complex issues. This is particularly evident in discussions surrounding politics, science, and social justice, where nuanced arguments are often reduced to soundbites. The consequences of sciolistic thinking can be detrimental. For instance, in the realm of public health, misinformation can spread rapidly, resulting in misguided beliefs about vaccines or treatments. When people rely on surface-level information, they may make choices that not only affect their own health but also the well-being of others. This highlights the importance of critical thinking and thorough research before forming opinions or making decisions. Moreover, sciolistic attitudes can hinder personal growth and development. When individuals believe they possess sufficient knowledge on a subject, they may become complacent and stop seeking further education. This stagnation can prevent them from achieving their full potential and limit their ability to contribute meaningfully to discussions. In contrast, those who approach learning with humility and curiosity are more likely to develop a comprehensive understanding of various topics. To combat sciolistic tendencies, we must encourage a culture of inquiry and openness. Educational institutions should emphasize critical thinking skills and the importance of questioning information sources. By fostering an environment where students feel comfortable exploring different perspectives, we can help them develop a deeper appreciation for knowledge and its complexities. Additionally, individuals can take proactive steps to avoid falling into the trap of sciolistic behavior. Engaging in active listening during conversations, asking clarifying questions, and seeking out diverse viewpoints can all contribute to a more profound understanding of issues. Furthermore, dedicating time to read books, attend lectures, or participate in workshops can enhance one’s knowledge base and encourage lifelong learning. In conclusion, while the desire to be knowledgeable is commendable, it is crucial to avoid falling into sciolistic habits. Superficial understanding can lead to misinformation and hinder personal growth. By promoting critical thinking and a genuine quest for knowledge, we can cultivate a society that values depth over breadth in understanding. Ultimately, true knowledge comes from a place of curiosity and a willingness to engage with complexity, rather than simply skimming the surface of information.

在当今快节奏的世界中，追求知识已成为个人的共同努力。然而，并不是每个声称拥有知识的人都真正具备深刻的理解。这种现象可以用sciolistic来描述，指的是对知识的肤浅或自以为是的展示，而没有真正的理解。认识到了解与真正知识之间的区别至关重要，因为前者往往会导致误解和误信。 考虑社交媒体对我们知识观念的影响。随着Twitter和Instagram等平台的兴起，许多人以惊人的速度分享观点和信息。虽然这可以促进讨论并传播意识，但它也鼓励了sciolistic行为。个人可能会在没有充分理解内容的情况下发布文章或引用，导致对复杂问题的理解稀释。这在围绕政治、科学和社会正义的讨论中尤为明显，微妙的论点常常被简化为口号。 sciolistic思维的后果可能是有害的。例如，在公共卫生领域，错误信息可能迅速传播，导致人们对疫苗或治疗方法产生误解。当人们依赖表面信息时，他们可能会做出不仅影响自己健康而且影响他人福祉的选择。这凸显了在形成意见或做出决定之前进行批判性思考和深入研究的重要性。 此外，sciolistic的态度可能会阻碍个人成长和发展。当个人相信自己对某一主题拥有足够的知识时，他们可能会变得自满，停止进一步学习。这种停滞可能会阻止他们实现自己的全部潜力，并限制他们在讨论中有意义地贡献的能力。相比之下，那些以谦逊和好奇心接近学习的人更有可能全面理解各种主题。 为了对抗sciolistic倾向，我们必须鼓励探究和开放的文化。教育机构应强调批判性思维技能以及质疑信息来源的重要性。通过营造一个让学生感到舒适探索不同观点的环境，我们可以帮助他们更深入地欣赏知识及其复杂性。 此外，个人可以采取积极措施，避免陷入sciolistic行为的陷阱。在对话中积极倾听、提出澄清问题以及寻求多样化观点都可以促进对问题的更深刻理解。此外，花时间阅读书籍、参加讲座或参与研讨会可以增强个人的知识基础并鼓励终身学习。 总之，尽管渴望获得知识是值得赞扬的，但避免陷入sciolistic习惯至关重要。肤浅的理解可能导致错误信息并阻碍个人成长。通过促进批判性思维和对知识的真诚追求，我们可以培养一个重视深度而非广度理解的社会。最终，真正的知识来自于好奇心和愿意与复杂性接触的地方，而不仅仅是对信息表面进行浏览。