seditionary

简明释义

英[sɪˈdɪʃənəri]美[sɪˈdɪʃəˌnerɪ]

n. 煽动叛乱者（等于 seditionist）

复 数 s e d i t i o n a r i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The government cracked down on the group for their seditionary 煽动叛乱的 activities against the state.

政府对这个团体因其对国家的seditionary 煽动叛乱的 活动进行了打击。

2.His seditionary 煽动叛乱的 speeches stirred unrest among the citizens.

他的seditionary 煽动叛乱的 演讲在市民中引发了动荡。

3.The authorities were concerned about the seditionary 煽动叛乱的 literature circulating in the region.

当局对该地区流传的seditionary 煽动叛乱的 文献表示担忧。

4.She was arrested for her seditionary 煽动叛乱的 role in organizing protests.

她因在组织抗议活动中的seditionary 煽动叛乱的 角色而被逮捕。

5.The seditionary 煽动叛乱的 actions were seen as a direct threat to national security.

这些seditionary 煽动叛乱的 行为被视为对国家安全的直接威胁。

作文

In a world where political tensions often run high, the term seditionary (煽动性的) becomes increasingly relevant. Understanding this word is essential for anyone interested in politics, law, or social movements. A seditionary act typically refers to actions or speech that incite rebellion against the authority of a state or government. This can include protests, writings, or any form of communication that aims to undermine the established order. Historically, many figures have been labeled as seditionary (煽动性的) for their roles in advocating for change. For instance, during the American Revolution, individuals like Thomas Paine wrote pamphlets that stirred the public's emotions and encouraged resistance against British rule. His work was deemed seditionary (煽动性的) by the British authorities, yet it played a crucial role in shaping the democratic ideals that the United States would later embrace. In modern contexts, the term seditionary (煽动性的) can be applied to various movements around the globe. Social media has transformed how ideas spread, making it easier for seditionary (煽动性的) messages to reach a wide audience quickly. Activists often use platforms like Twitter and Facebook to organize protests and share information that challenges governmental policies. While some view these actions as necessary for democracy, others see them as threats to national security. The legal implications of being labeled as seditionary (煽动性的) can be severe. Many countries have laws against sedition, which can lead to imprisonment for those found guilty of inciting rebellion. This raises important questions about freedom of speech and the limits of expression. Should individuals be punished for expressing dissenting opinions, or is it their right to challenge authority? The balance between maintaining order and allowing dissent is a delicate one. Governments must navigate the fine line between protecting national security and upholding democratic freedoms. In some cases, labeling a movement or individual as seditionary (煽动性的) can be a tactic used to silence opposition. This has been seen in various regimes that suppress dissent to maintain control over their populace. Moreover, the impact of seditionary (煽动性的) actions can extend beyond immediate political consequences. They can inspire future generations to engage in activism and advocate for their rights. The legacy of seditionary (煽动性的) figures often serves as a reminder of the importance of standing up against injustice. For example, leaders like Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr. were once considered seditionary (煽动性的) for their efforts to challenge oppressive systems. Their eventual recognition as heroes underscores the evolving nature of societal values. In conclusion, the term seditionary (煽动性的) encapsulates a complex interplay between authority and dissent. It highlights the struggles that individuals face when challenging established norms and the potential repercussions of such actions. As we continue to navigate an increasingly polarized world, understanding the implications of being labeled as seditionary (煽动性的) is crucial for fostering open dialogue and promoting democratic principles. Ultimately, the fight for justice and equality often requires a willingness to engage in seditionary (煽动性的) acts, reminding us that history is shaped by those who dare to speak out against injustice.

在一个政治紧张局势经常高涨的世界里，术语seditionary（煽动性的）变得愈发相关。理解这个词对任何对政治、法律或社会运动感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。seditionary（煽动性的）行为通常是指激励反抗国家或政府权威的行为或言论。这可以包括抗议、著作或任何旨在破坏既定秩序的沟通形式。历史上，许多人物因其倡导变革的角色而被贴上seditionary（煽动性的）标签。例如，在美国独立战争期间，托马斯·潘恩撰写的小册子激发了公众情绪并鼓励抵抗英国统治。他的作品被英国当局视为seditionary（煽动性的），然而它在塑造后来美国所接受的民主理念中发挥了至关重要的作用。 在现代背景下，seditionary（煽动性的）一词可以应用于全球各地的各种运动。社交媒体改变了思想传播的方式，使得seditionary（煽动性的）信息能够迅速接触到广泛的观众。活动家们常常利用推特和脸书等平台组织抗议活动并分享挑战政府政策的信息。虽然一些人认为这些行动对民主是必要的，但其他人则视其为对国家安全的威胁。 被标记为seditionary（煽动性的）的法律后果可能是严重的。许多国家都有关于煽动叛乱的法律，这可能导致那些被判有罪的人入狱。这引发了关于言论自由和表达界限的重要问题。个人是否应该因表达异议而受到惩罚，还是他们有权挑战权威？ 维护秩序与允许异议之间的平衡是微妙的。政府必须在保护国家安全和维护民主自由之间找到微妙的平衡。在某些情况下，将运动或个人标记为seditionary（煽动性的）可能是一种用来压制反对派的策略。这在各种政权中都可以看到，它们压制异议以维持对民众的控制。 此外，seditionary（煽动性的）行为的影响可以超越直接的政治后果。它们可以激励未来的几代人参与活动并倡导自己的权利。seditionary（煽动性的）人物的遗产常常提醒我们站出来反对不公正的重要性。例如，纳尔逊·曼德拉和马丁·路德·金等领导者曾因努力挑战压迫制度而被视为seditionary（煽动性的）。他们最终被认可为英雄，突显了社会价值观不断演变的本质。 总之，术语seditionary（煽动性的）概括了权威与异议之间复杂的相互作用。它突显了个人在挑战既定规范时所面临的斗争以及此类行为的潜在后果。随着我们继续在一个日益两极化的世界中航行，理解被标记为seditionary（煽动性的）含义对于促进开放对话和推动民主原则至关重要。最终，争取正义和平等的斗争往往需要愿意参与seditionary（煽动性的）行为，提醒我们历史是由那些敢于反对不公正的人塑造的。