seditious

简明释义

英[sɪˈdɪʃəs]美[sɪˈdɪʃəs]

adj. 煽动性的；扰乱治安的；参与煽动的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Kyle Durrie aims to follow in these wheel ruts, seditious in her own way, providing hands-on experience in the disintermediation of letterpress printing.

凯儿。达里决心要追随历史的车辙，并用她自己的方式去影响人们，提供他们凸版印刷所带来的与文字直接相连的切身感受。

2.Kyle Durrie aims to follow in these wheel ruts, seditious in her own way, providing hands-on experience in the disintermediation of letterpress printing.

凯儿。达里决心要追随历史的车辙，并用她自己的方式去影响人们，提供他们凸版印刷所带来的与文字直接相连的切身感受。

3.Palin said that, "the seditious lecture may fill up an open-air athletic field, but does not have the means guarantee country security actually."

佩林说，“煽动性的演讲可以填满一个露天运动场，但是却没有办法保证国家的安全。”

4.He distributed a seditious pamphlet called the rights of man.

他散发了名叫《人的权利》的带有煽动性的小册子。

5.He fell under suspicion for distributing seditious pamphlets.

他因分发反政府传单而受到怀疑。

6.The scandalous, seditious and libelous books that need to be brought to justice in this remarkable sentence are suddenly revealed to have a soul.

在这一非凡的判决中，需要被绳之以法的诽谤、煽动性和诽谤的书籍，突然间显露出了灵魂。

7.The government cracked down on the seditious activities that threatened national security.

政府打击了那些威胁国家安全的煽动叛乱的活动。

8.His seditious speech incited the crowd to protest against the authorities.

他的煽动叛乱的演讲激起了人群对当局的抗议。

9.The police arrested several individuals for their seditious writings online.

警方因这些人的网上煽动叛乱的文章逮捕了他们。

10.The regime viewed any form of dissent as seditious and punishable by law.

该政权将任何形式的异议视为煽动叛乱的，并依法惩罚。

11.Distributing seditious pamphlets can lead to serious legal consequences.

散发煽动叛乱的小册子可能会导致严重的法律后果。

作文

In modern society, the concept of freedom of speech is often celebrated as a fundamental human right. However, this freedom comes with its own set of challenges, particularly when it intersects with actions that can be deemed as seditious (煽动叛乱的). The term seditious refers to behavior or speech that incites rebellion against the authority of a state or government. This raises important questions about the balance between individual rights and societal stability. One of the most significant aspects of seditious acts is their potential to disrupt social order. When individuals or groups engage in seditious activities, they often do so under the pretext of advocating for change or justice. While these goals may seem noble, the methods employed can lead to chaos and violence. For instance, protests that escalate into riots can be categorized as seditious if they aim to overthrow the government or undermine its authority. This poses a dilemma: how do we protect the right to protest while also maintaining public safety? Historically, many governments have struggled to define the line between legitimate dissent and seditious behavior. In some cases, regimes have labeled peaceful protests as seditious to suppress opposition and maintain control. This misuse of power highlights the potential dangers of overly broad definitions of seditious actions. It is crucial for democratic societies to ensure that laws regarding seditious behavior are applied fairly and justly, without infringing on the rights of individuals to express their opinions. Moreover, the rise of social media has complicated the landscape of seditious speech. Online platforms provide a space for individuals to voice their grievances, but they also facilitate the rapid spread of misinformation and incitement. A single post can ignite a movement, which can quickly turn into seditious action. Governments around the world are grappling with how to regulate online speech without stifling free expression. This balancing act is essential to prevent the escalation of seditious sentiments that could threaten national security. In conclusion, the term seditious (煽动叛乱的) encompasses a wide range of behaviors that challenge authority. While it is vital to uphold the principles of free speech, it is equally important to recognize the potential consequences of seditious actions. Societies must navigate the delicate balance between allowing dissent and protecting the integrity of their institutions. As we move forward, ongoing discussions about the nature of seditious speech will be essential in shaping policies that respect individual rights while ensuring collective security.

在现代社会，言论自由的概念常常被视为基本人权。然而，这种自由伴随着一系列挑战，尤其是在与可能被视为煽动叛乱的行为交叉时。煽动叛乱的一词指的是激励反对国家或政府权威的行为或言论。这引发了关于个人权利与社会稳定之间平衡的重要问题。 煽动叛乱的行为最显著的一个方面是其潜在的破坏社会秩序的能力。当个人或团体参与煽动叛乱的活动时，他们往往以倡导变革或正义为名。虽然这些目标看似高尚，但所采用的方法可能会导致混乱和暴力。例如，当抗议活动升级为骚乱时，如果其目的是推翻政府或削弱其权威，则可以将其归类为煽动叛乱的。这就提出了一个困境：我们如何在保护抗议权利的同时维护公共安全？ 历史上，许多政府一直在努力定义合法异议与煽动叛乱的行为之间的界限。在某些情况下，政权将和平抗议标记为煽动叛乱的，以压制反对意见并维持控制。这种权力的误用突显了对煽动叛乱的行为过于宽泛的定义的潜在危险。对于民主社会来说，确保关于煽动叛乱的行为的法律公平公正地适用至关重要，而不侵犯个人表达意见的权利。 此外，社交媒体的兴起使得煽动叛乱的言论的格局变得复杂。在线平台为个人表达不满提供了空间，但它们也促进了错误信息和煽动的快速传播。一条帖子可能点燃一场运动，而这场运动很快就可能转变为煽动叛乱的行动。世界各地的政府正在努力解决如何在不压制自由表达的情况下规范在线言论的问题。这种平衡至关重要，以防止煽动叛乱的情绪升级，威胁国家安全。 总之，煽动叛乱的（煽动叛乱的）一词涵盖了一系列挑战权威的行为。尽管维护言论自由的原则至关重要，但同样重要的是认识到煽动叛乱的行为可能带来的后果。社会必须在允许异议和保护其机构完整性之间找到微妙的平衡。随着我们向前发展，关于煽动叛乱的言论性质的持续讨论将在塑造尊重个人权利的政策方面发挥重要作用，同时确保集体安全。