sensationalist

简明释义

英[senˈseɪʃənəlɪst]美[senˈseɪʃənəlɪst]

n. 感觉论者；哗众取宠

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Although tabloid news is in decline in print, it is staging a revival online, where sensationalist headlines attract most clicks.

尽管小报急速衰落，它正在网上东山再起，在网上一条爆炸性头条就能招来无数次点击。

2.Jermaine Jackson slammed such reports as misleading and "sensationalist".

三爷对这些误导和煸情的报道简直出离愤怒了！

3.Preemptively trying to shut down the dialogue by shouting at the curious is the truly sensationalist move here.

要通过对好奇者叫嚣来先发制人结束对话，这样真的是彻彻底底的耸人听闻的举动。

4.A top market-watcher with HSBC agrees, saying the fear of rising interest rates is "quite sensationalist."

汇丰银行高端市场观察员也同意，那些声称提高利率的恐慌的人“纯属感觉论者”。

5.The studies by PARC are some of the best scientific analysis of Wikipedia's community ever done, but it's led to some rather sensationalist conclusions by media outlets.

在所有对Wikipedia社区的分析中，本次研究堪称是上等佳作，但媒体却得出了一些耸动视听的结论。

6.Soon, the sensationalist press of the 1890s became a competition between the "yellow kids," and the journalistic style was coined "yellow journalism."

很快，1980年代的煽情新闻风在黄孩子之争中甚嚣尘上，而这种新闻风格也就铸就了“黄色新闻”之名。

7.Yellow journals like the new York journal and the new York World relied on sensationalist headlines to sell newspapers.

黄色报纸，像《纽约新闻报》和《纽约世界报》都依靠着煽情标题销售报纸。

8.One of the better online gambling jurisdictions, Malta, has repudiated general sensationalist claims that the industry is unregulated and unscrupulous.

信誉卓著的网上博彩司法管辖区马耳他否定了一般写煽情文章的人的声称网络博彩产业是不规范的和不择手段的。

9.The news article was criticized for being too sensationalist.

这篇新闻文章因过于耸人听闻而受到批评。

10.Many sensationalist reports can lead to public panic.

许多耸人听闻的报道可能导致公众恐慌。

11.The movie was a sensationalist portrayal of the events.

这部电影是对事件的耸人听闻的描绘。

12.Critics argue that sensationalist journalism undermines trust in the media.

批评者认为，耸人听闻的新闻报道削弱了公众对媒体的信任。

13.The documentary avoided sensationalist tactics and focused on facts.

这部纪录片避免了耸人听闻的手法，专注于事实。

作文

In today's media landscape, the term sensationalist refers to a style of journalism or reporting that emphasizes shocking or exciting stories at the expense of accuracy and depth. This approach is often used to attract attention and generate buzz, but it can lead to a distorted perception of reality. For instance, news outlets may focus on extreme events, such as natural disasters or violent crimes, while neglecting more mundane but equally important issues, such as poverty or education. The sensationalist nature of some media can create a sense of fear and anxiety among the public, as they are constantly bombarded with alarming headlines and stories. This phenomenon is not limited to traditional news media; it has also permeated social media platforms where clickbait headlines and viral videos often take precedence over factual reporting. Moreover, the rise of the internet has made it easier for sensationalist content to spread rapidly. With the ability to share information instantly, individuals and organizations can publish articles or posts that prioritize sensationalism over journalistic integrity. This can contribute to the spread of misinformation and create echo chambers where people only consume content that aligns with their existing beliefs. In such environments, sensationalist narratives can flourish, leading to polarization and division within society. The impact of sensationalist reporting extends beyond just the media; it influences public opinion and policy decisions as well. When the public is constantly exposed to exaggerated stories, they may develop skewed perceptions of risk and danger. For example, if the media disproportionately covers violent crime, citizens may feel unsafe in their communities, even if crime rates are actually declining. This misperception can lead to calls for harsher laws or increased policing, which may not address the root causes of crime. To combat the effects of sensationalist reporting, it is essential for consumers of news to develop critical thinking skills. By questioning the sources of information and seeking out diverse perspectives, individuals can gain a more balanced understanding of complex issues. Furthermore, media literacy programs can help educate the public about the differences between sensationalist reporting and responsible journalism. These programs can empower individuals to recognize when they are encountering sensationalist content and encourage them to seek out more reliable sources. In conclusion, while sensationalist reporting may capture attention and generate clicks, its long-term consequences can be detrimental to society. It is crucial for both media producers and consumers to prioritize accuracy and depth in reporting. By fostering a culture of responsible journalism and critical consumption, we can mitigate the negative effects of sensationalist narratives and promote a more informed and engaged public. Ultimately, the responsibility lies with all of us to demand better from our media and to seek out the truth amidst the noise of sensationalism.

在当今的媒体环境中，术语耸人听闻的指的是一种强调震惊或激动故事而牺牲准确性和深度的新闻或报道风格。这种方法通常用于吸引注意力并产生轰动效应，但可能导致对现实的扭曲感知。例如，新闻机构可能会关注极端事件，如自然灾害或暴力犯罪，而忽视更平凡但同样重要的问题，如贫困或教育。一些媒体的耸人听闻的性质可能会在公众中造成恐惧和焦虑，因为他们不断受到令人不安的头条和故事的轰炸。这种现象不仅限于传统新闻媒体；它还渗透到社交媒体平台，在这些平台上，点击诱饵标题和病毒视频往往优先于事实报道。 此外，互联网的兴起使得耸人听闻的内容迅速传播变得更加容易。由于能够即时分享信息，个人和组织可以发布优先考虑耸人听闻而非新闻诚信的文章或帖子。这可能导致错误信息的传播，并创造出回音室，在这些回音室中，人们只消费与自己现有信念一致的内容。在这样的环境中，耸人听闻的叙述可能蓬勃发展，导致社会内部的极化和分裂。 耸人听闻的报道的影响超出了媒体本身；它也影响了公众舆论和政策决策。当公众不断接触到夸大的故事时，他们可能会对风险和危险形成扭曲的看法。例如，如果媒体不成比例地报道暴力犯罪，公民可能会在社区中感到不安全，即使犯罪率实际上在下降。这种误解可能导致对更严厉法律或增加警务的呼吁，这可能无法解决犯罪的根本原因。 为了抵消耸人听闻的报道的影响，新闻消费者需要培养批判性思维能力。通过质疑信息来源并寻求多元化的观点，个人可以对复杂问题获得更平衡的理解。此外，媒体素养项目可以帮助教育公众识别耸人听闻的报道与负责任的新闻之间的区别。这些项目可以赋予个人识别何时遇到耸人听闻的内容的能力，并鼓励他们寻求更可靠的来源。 总之，尽管耸人听闻的报道可能吸引注意力并产生点击量，但其长期后果可能对社会产生有害影响。对于媒体制作人和消费者来说，优先考虑报道的准确性和深度至关重要。通过培养负责任的新闻文化和批判性消费，我们可以减轻耸人听闻的叙述的负面影响，促进一个更有信息和参与感的公众。最终，责任在于我们所有人，要求我们的媒体提供更好的内容，并在耸人听闻的喧嚣中寻求真相。