specious

简明释义

英[ˈspiːʃəs]美[ˈspiːʃəs]

adj. 似是而非的；外表美观的；华而不实的；徒有其表的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.I'd like a specious room.

我要一间装饰漂亮的房间。

2.Rebuilding trust will be a slow process. It will not be achieved through specious experiments.

重建信任需要一个缓慢的过程，不可能通过似是而非的实验来实现。

3.A specious smile, perfunctory my real emotions.

一抹似是而非的笑，敷衍了我的真实情绪。

4.The argument that the Palestinians must resume negotiations before getting statehood is specious.

认为巴勒斯坦在取得国家地位之前必须恢复谈判的观点是似是而非的。

5.It is unlikely that the Duke was convinced by such specious arguments.

公爵不太可能被这种貌似正确的理由说服。

6.Old building was torn open, old friend broadcast, the detail in memory is more and more specious.

老房子拆了，故人四散，记忆里的细节越来越似是而非。

7.I think your argument is specious.

我认为你的论证华而不实。

8.It's specious rear compartment can also be used for cargo or weapon platform.

它也是拥有外观好看的后车箱能用于货物或武器平台。

9.But other claims made for enlarging the airport are specious or misleading.

不过来自其他方面的一些促进机场扩建的主张就有些误导和华而不实了。

10.The politician's argument was specious, appealing to emotions but lacking real evidence.

这位政治家的论点是似是而非的，虽然感情上吸引人，但缺乏真正的证据。

11.Many advertisements use specious claims to lure customers into buying products.

许多广告使用似是而非的说法来吸引顾客购买产品。

12.His specious reasoning fooled many, but those with critical thinking saw through it.

他的似是而非的推理欺骗了许多人，但那些具备批判性思维的人看穿了它。

13.The professor warned against specious arguments that seem logical at first glance.

教授警告要小心那些初看似乎合逻辑的似是而非的论点。

14.While the solution sounded good, it was ultimately specious and impractical.

虽然这个解决方案听起来不错，但最终是似是而非的且不切实际。

作文

In the realm of critical thinking and logical reasoning, it is essential to differentiate between valid arguments and those that may appear convincing at first glance but are fundamentally flawed. One such term that encapsulates this idea is specious, which refers to something that seems plausible or attractive but is actually misleading or deceptive. The concept of specious reasoning can be found in various contexts, from everyday conversations to complex debates in academia. Consider a scenario where a politician presents statistics about unemployment rates, claiming that their policies have dramatically improved the job market. At first, these figures may seem impressive; however, upon closer examination, one might discover that the data has been manipulated or taken out of context. This is a classic example of specious arguments, as the initial appearance of truth is overshadowed by a lack of substance upon further investigation. In academic settings, specious reasoning can lead to significant misunderstandings. Students may encounter specious claims in research papers or articles that present biased information as objective fact. For instance, an article might highlight a correlation between two variables without acknowledging other factors that could influence the outcome. This tendency to oversimplify complex issues can create a false sense of understanding, leading readers to accept specious conclusions without critical analysis. Moreover, the media often plays a role in propagating specious narratives. Headlines designed to grab attention may distort the truth, leading audiences to form opinions based on incomplete or misleading information. In an age where information spreads rapidly, it is crucial for individuals to develop the ability to discern specious claims from factual reporting. To combat the prevalence of specious reasoning, education systems must emphasize critical thinking skills. Teaching students how to evaluate sources, identify biases, and analyze arguments can empower them to recognize when they are being presented with specious information. Furthermore, fostering an environment where questioning and skepticism are encouraged can help individuals become more discerning consumers of information. In conclusion, the term specious serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking in our daily lives. Whether in politics, academia, or media, the ability to identify specious arguments is essential for making informed decisions. By honing our analytical skills and remaining vigilant against misleading information, we can navigate the complexities of the modern world with greater clarity and confidence. Understanding the implications of specious reasoning not only enhances our intellectual capabilities but also contributes to a more informed and engaged society.

在批判性思维和逻辑推理的领域，区分有效论证与那些乍看之下似乎令人信服但实际上存在根本缺陷的论证至关重要。一个能够概括这一思想的术语是specious，它指的是某种看似合理或吸引人的东西，但实际上却具有误导性或欺骗性。在各种背景下都可以找到specious推理的概念，从日常对话到复杂的学术辩论。 考虑一个场景，一位政治家展示关于失业率的统计数据，声称他们的政策大大改善了就业市场。乍一看，这些数字似乎令人印象深刻；然而，经过仔细审查，人们可能会发现这些数据被操纵或脱离了上下文。这是specious论点的经典例子，因为真相的初步外观在进一步调查中被缺乏实质内容所掩盖。 在学术环境中，specious推理可能导致重大的误解。学生可能会在研究论文或文章中遇到specious主张，这些主张将偏见信息呈现为客观事实。例如，一篇文章可能强调两个变量之间的相关性，而不承认其他可能影响结果的因素。这种简化复杂问题的倾向会产生一种虚假的理解感，使读者在没有进行批判性分析的情况下接受specious结论。 此外，媒体往往在传播specious叙事中发挥作用。旨在吸引注意力的标题可能会扭曲真相，导致观众基于不完整或误导性的信息形成意见。在信息迅速传播的时代，个人必须发展出辨别specious主张与事实报道的能力。 为了应对specious推理的普遍存在，教育系统必须强调批判性思维技能。教导学生如何评估来源、识别偏见和分析论证，可以使他们能够认识到何时被呈现specious信息。此外，培养一个鼓励质疑和怀疑的环境可以帮助个人成为更具鉴别力的信息消费者。 总之，术语specious提醒我们在日常生活中批判性思维的重要性。无论是在政治、学术还是媒体中，识别specious论点的能力对于做出明智的决定至关重要。通过磨练我们的分析技能并保持对误导信息的警惕，我们可以更清晰、更自信地驾驭现代世界的复杂性。理解specious推理的含义不仅增强了我们的智力能力，也有助于构建一个更知情和参与的社会。