syllogisms

简明释义

英[ˈsɪlədʒɪzəmz]美[ˈsɪlədʒɪzəmz]

三段论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The enthymeme is a sort of syllogism, and the consideration of syllogisms of all kinds, without distinction, is the business of dialectic, either of dialectic as a whole or of one of its branches.

推理论证是一种三段论，正如每一种辩证法都或多或少地在运用三段论。

2.The enthymeme is a sort of syllogism, and the consideration of syllogisms of all kinds, without distinction, is the business of dialectic, either of dialectic as a whole or of one of its branches.

推理论证是一种三段论，正如每一种辩证法都或多或少地在运用三段论。

3.There is an important distinction between two sorts of enthymemes that has been wholly overlooked by almost everybody — one that also subsists between the syllogisms treated of in dialectic.

两种推理论证之间，存在这一种几乎被所有人完全忽略了的重要区别——一种同样存在于辩证法中的三段论之间的区别，而且也有着相似的遭遇。

4.In the Analytics a more explicit description has been given of these points; it is there shown why some of these reasonings can be put into syllogisms and some cannot.

在《分析篇》中对这些进行了更详尽的描述；在该篇中说明了为什么这些推理中一些可进入三段论而另一些却不能。

5.The manuscript begins by examining the basics of the deductive syllogisms and then turns to inductive generalizations and the uses and abuses of analogies.

本文首先探讨了逻辑三段论的基本知识，然后阐述归纳概括以及类比的使用和误用。

6.Interestingly, syllogisms are easier to evaluate in the form "no flying things are penguins; all penguins are birds; so some birds are not fliers."

有意思的是我们觉得这样的三段论更容易判断：“没有飞行的物体会是企鹅，所有企鹅都是鸟类，所以有些鸟类不是飞行物。”

7.Undefined truth-values in the square of opposition cannot be used as a simple proposition in hypothetical syllogisms vaguely.

对当关系中的真假不定不能看作是一简单命题用于假言三段论。

8.There are few facts of the "necessary" type that can form the basis of rhetorical syllogisms.

很少有能够形成修辞学三段论基础的“必要”类型的事实。

9.We live in a time of syllogisms: "It is what it is" and "It's all good, " for example.

我们生活在推理的时代：“它就是它”，“一切都很好”。

10.In philosophy class, we learned about syllogisms 三段论 and how they can help structure logical arguments.

在哲学课上，我们学习了关于syllogisms 三段论的内容，以及它们如何帮助构建逻辑论证。

11.The detective used syllogisms 三段论 to deduce the suspect's motive based on the evidence.

侦探利用syllogisms 三段论根据证据推断嫌疑犯的动机。

12.In her essay, she included several syllogisms 三段论 to support her thesis effectively.

在她的论文中，她包含了几个syllogisms 三段论以有效支持她的论点。

13.The debate team practiced using syllogisms 三段论 to strengthen their arguments against opposing views.

辩论队练习使用syllogisms 三段论来加强他们对反对观点的论证。

14.Understanding syllogisms 三段论 is crucial for anyone studying logic or critical thinking.

理解syllogisms 三段论对任何学习逻辑或批判性思维的人来说都是至关重要的。

作文

In the realm of logic and reasoning, syllogisms play a crucial role in understanding how we draw conclusions from premises. A syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning that consists of two premises followed by a conclusion. For example, consider the classic syllogism: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This structure highlights the power of logical inference and illustrates how we can derive valid conclusions based on established truths. The importance of syllogisms extends beyond mere academic exercises; they are fundamental to critical thinking and effective communication. In everyday life, we often encounter situations where we need to make decisions based on available information. By employing syllogisms, we can clarify our thoughts and ensure that our conclusions are logically sound. For instance, if we know that "All birds lay eggs" and "A penguin is a bird," we can confidently conclude that "A penguin lays eggs." This ability to reason logically is essential not only in philosophy but also in fields such as law, science, and even personal relationships. However, it is important to recognize that not all arguments are structured as syllogisms. While they provide a clear framework for reasoning, real-life situations often involve more complex scenarios with multiple variables. This complexity can lead to logical fallacies if one is not careful. For example, the fallacy of affirming the consequent occurs when someone assumes that because a conclusion is true, the premises must also be true. If we say, "If it rains, the ground will be wet. The ground is wet, therefore it must have rained," we overlook other possibilities, such as someone watering the garden. To effectively use syllogisms, one must practice identifying valid premises and ensuring that they lead to a sound conclusion. This requires not only an understanding of the principles of logic but also a willingness to question assumptions and examine evidence critically. In educational settings, teaching students about syllogisms can enhance their analytical skills and prepare them for complex problem-solving tasks. Moreover, the study of syllogisms can enrich our appreciation for language and rhetoric. The way we construct arguments can significantly impact how our ideas are received. A well-structured syllogism can persuade others and facilitate constructive dialogue. Conversely, poorly constructed arguments can lead to misunderstandings and conflict. Therefore, mastering the art of syllogisms is not just about logic; it is also about effective communication and the ability to engage thoughtfully with others. In conclusion, syllogisms are a foundational element of logical reasoning that helps us navigate the complexities of thought and argumentation. By understanding and applying syllogisms, we can improve our critical thinking abilities, enhance our communication skills, and make more informed decisions in various aspects of life. As we continue to engage with the world around us, let us remember the value of clear reasoning and the role that syllogisms play in fostering understanding and clarity.

在逻辑和推理领域，三段论在理解我们如何从前提中得出结论方面发挥着至关重要的作用。三段论是一种演绎推理形式，由两个前提和一个结论组成。例如，考虑经典的三段论："所有人都是凡人。苏格拉底是一个人。因此，苏格拉底是凡人。"这个结构突显了逻辑推理的力量，并说明了我们如何根据已建立的真理推导出有效的结论。 三段论的重要性不仅限于学术练习；它们是批判性思维和有效沟通的基础。在日常生活中，我们经常遇到需要根据可用信息做出决策的情况。通过运用三段论，我们可以澄清我们的思想，并确保我们的结论在逻辑上是合理的。例如，如果我们知道"所有鸟类都会下蛋"和"企鹅是一种鸟"，我们可以自信地得出"企鹅会下蛋"的结论。这种逻辑推理的能力不仅在哲学中至关重要，在法律、科学甚至个人关系等领域也同样重要。 然而，重要的是要认识到，并非所有论点都以三段论的形式构建。虽然它们提供了一个清晰的推理框架，但现实生活中的情况往往涉及更复杂的场景和多个变量。这种复杂性如果不加以注意，可能导致逻辑谬误。例如，确认后件谬误发生在某人假设因为结论是真的，前提也必须是真的。如果我们说：“如果下雨，地面就会湿。地面湿了，因此一定是下雨了，”我们忽略了其他可能性，比如有人在浇花。 为了有效地使用三段论，人们必须练习识别有效的前提，并确保它们导致合理的结论。这不仅需要理解逻辑原则，还需要质疑假设并批判性地检查证据。在教育环境中，教学生关于三段论的知识可以提高他们的分析能力，并为他们准备复杂的问题解决任务。 此外，研究三段论可以丰富我们对语言和修辞的欣赏。我们构建论点的方式可以显著影响我们的思想被接受的方式。一个结构良好的三段论可以说服他人并促进建设性的对话。相反，构建不良的论点可能导致误解和冲突。因此，掌握三段论的艺术不仅仅是关于逻辑；它还涉及有效的沟通以及与他人进行深思熟虑的互动的能力。 总之，三段论是逻辑推理的基础元素，帮助我们应对思想和论证的复杂性。通过理解和应用三段论，我们可以提高我们的批判性思维能力，增强我们的沟通技能，并在生活的各个方面做出更明智的决策。当我们继续与周围的世界互动时，让我们记住清晰推理的价值，以及三段论在促进理解和清晰度方面所发挥的作用。