tyrannize

简明释义

英[ˈtɪrənaɪz]美[ˈtɪrənaɪz]

vi. 施行暴政；欺压

vt. 施行虐政；欺压

第 三 人 称 单 数 t y r a n n i z e s

现 在 分 词 t y r a n n i z i n g

过 去 式 t y r a n n i z e d

过 去 分 词 t y r a n n i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.These few, however, tyrannize the worker, who is so healthy that he is incapable of inventing ornament. They force him to execute ornament which they have designed, in the most diverse materials.

但这些少数人强制健康的、不会发明装饰的工人，他们逼迫他用各种材料制作他们发明的装饰。

2.These few, however, tyrannize the worker, who is so healthy that he is incapable of inventing ornament. They force him to execute ornament which they have designed, in the most diverse materials.

但这些少数人强制健康的、不会发明装饰的工人，他们逼迫他用各种材料制作他们发明的装饰。

3.At this point, choice no longer liberates, but debilitates. It might even be said to tyrannize.

在这一点上，选择不再成为一种自由，反倒是束缚，甚至可以说成一种虐待。

4.He often misuses his authority to tyrannize his underlings.

他常用手中的职权凌轹下属。

5.The strong should not tyrannize the weak.

强者不该欺压弱者。

6.Armed groups use their power to tyrannize over civilians.

武装组织用它们的武力来欺压平民。

7.The dictator would often tyrannize the people, enforcing strict laws and punishments.

这个独裁者经常暴政统治人民，实施严格的法律和惩罚。

8.In the novel, the villain sought to tyrannize the kingdom through fear and oppression.

在这部小说中，反派试图通过恐惧和压迫来暴政统治王国。

9.Teachers should not tyrannize their students but rather inspire them to learn.

老师不应该暴政统治他们的学生，而是应该激励他们学习。

10.The manager's harsh tactics seemed to tyrannize the employees, causing low morale.

经理的严厉手段似乎在暴政统治员工，导致士气低落。

11.Children should never feel tyrannized by their peers; friendships should be supportive.

孩子们绝不应该感到被同龄人暴政统治; 友谊应该是支持性的。

作文

Throughout history, the concept of tyranny has been a prevalent theme in many societies. Tyranny is often characterized by the oppressive rule of a single leader or a small group who exercise power without regard for the rights and freedoms of the populace. In this context, it is crucial to understand how such leaders can tyrannize their subjects, leading to widespread suffering and discontent. The term tyrannize refers to the act of exercising absolute power in a cruel and oppressive manner, often silencing dissent and stripping individuals of their basic human rights. One of the most notable examples of tyranny can be found in the reign of dictators throughout the 20th century. Leaders like Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are infamous for their ability to tyrannize entire nations, using fear and propaganda to maintain control. Their regimes were marked by brutal crackdowns on opposition, censorship of the media, and widespread violations of human rights. People lived in constant fear of being persecuted for speaking out against the government, illustrating how tyranny can create an atmosphere of oppression that stifles creativity and freedom. The psychological effects of living under a tyrannical regime can be profound. Individuals may feel powerless and hopeless, leading to a sense of despair that permeates society. This emotional toll can result in a culture of silence, where people refrain from expressing their thoughts or opinions for fear of retribution. In such environments, the act of dissent becomes a dangerous endeavor, and many choose to remain silent rather than risk the wrath of those in power. Thus, the ability to tyrannize extends beyond physical oppression; it also includes the manipulation of people's minds and beliefs. Moreover, the consequences of tyranny are not limited to the immediate effects on the population. The long-term impact can lead to societal decay, as trust erodes and communities become fragmented. When a government chooses to tyrannize its citizens, it undermines the very foundations of society, including justice, equality, and respect for individual rights. This can result in a cycle of violence and retaliation, as oppressed individuals seek to reclaim their autonomy and dignity. In contrast, societies that promote democracy and uphold the rule of law tend to flourish. When people are empowered to express their opinions and participate in governance, they are less likely to experience the kind of oppression that comes with tyranny. History has shown us that when individuals are allowed to speak freely and challenge authority, they can bring about significant positive change. Movements for civil rights and social justice have often emerged in response to tyrannical practices, highlighting the resilience of the human spirit in the face of oppression. In conclusion, the ability to tyrannize is a powerful tool wielded by those in positions of authority. Understanding the implications of tyranny is essential for recognizing the importance of safeguarding our rights and freedoms. By learning from past atrocities and advocating for justice, we can work towards a future where tyranny has no place. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that history does not repeat itself, and that we stand against any form of oppression that seeks to tyrannize the human spirit.

纵观历史，暴政的概念在许多社会中都是一个普遍的主题。暴政通常被描述为单一领导者或小集团的压迫性统治，他们在行使权力时不顾民众的权利和自由。在这种背景下，理解这些领导者如何能够tyrannize他们的臣民是至关重要的，这导致了广泛的痛苦和不满。术语tyrannize指的是以残酷和压迫的方式行使绝对权力的行为，通常会压制异议，剥夺个人的基本人权。 20世纪独裁者的统治是暴政最显著的例子之一。像阿道夫·希特勒和约瑟夫·斯大林这样的领导者因其能力而臭名昭著，他们能够tyrannize整个国家，利用恐惧和宣传来维持控制。他们的政权以对反对派的残酷打击、对媒体的审查和对人权的广泛侵犯为特征。人们生活在对政府进行反对时遭受迫害的恐惧中，这表明暴政如何创造出一种压迫的氛围，扼杀创造力和自由。 生活在暴政统治下的心理影响可能是深远的。个人可能会感到无能为力和绝望，导致一种弥漫于社会的绝望感。这种情感上的代价可能导致沉默文化的形成，人们因为害怕报复而避免表达自己的想法或观点。在这样的环境中，异议的行为变得危险，许多人选择保持沉默，而不是冒着权力者愤怒的风险。因此，tyrannize的能力超越了身体上的压迫；它还包括对人们思想和信仰的操控。 此外，暴政的后果不仅限于对民众的直接影响。长期影响可能导致社会衰退，因为信任减弱，社区变得支离破碎。当一个政府选择tyrannize其公民时，它破坏了社会的基本基础，包括正义、平等和对个人权利的尊重。这可能导致暴力和报复的循环，因为被压迫的人试图重新夺回他们的自主权和尊严。 相比之下，促进民主和维护法治的社会往往繁荣昌盛。当人们有能力自由表达意见并参与治理时，他们不太可能经历暴政带来的压迫。历史告诉我们，当个人被允许自由发言并挑战权威时，他们可以带来重大积极变化。民权和社会正义运动通常是在对暴政做出回应时出现的，突显了人类精神在压迫面前的韧性。 总之，tyrannize的能力是掌握在权威者手中的强大工具。理解暴政的含义对于认识保护我们的权利和自由的重要性至关重要。通过从过去的暴行中学习并倡导正义，我们可以朝着一个没有暴政的未来努力。确保历史不会重演，抵制任何形式的压迫，以免tyrannize人类精神，是我们共同的责任。