unstratified

简明释义

英[ʌnˈstrætɪˌfaɪd]美[ʌnˈstrætəˌfaɪd]

adj. [地质] 不成层的；无层理的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The jet behavior of a multi nozzle head scaled from an existing engineering was investigated experimentally in a steady unstratified receiving water body.

在没有密度分层的容泄水体条件下，对某污水排海工程多孔喷头的射流特性进行了实验研究。

2.The jet behavior of a multi nozzle head scaled from an existing engineering was investigated experimentally in a steady unstratified receiving water body.

在没有密度分层的容泄水体条件下，对某污水排海工程多孔喷头的射流特性进行了实验研究。

3.The geological survey revealed that the area was composed of unstratified 未分层的 sediments, indicating a rapid deposition of materials.

地质调查显示该地区由未分层的未分层的沉积物组成，表明材料迅速沉积。

4.In sociology, an unstratified 未分层的 society lacks clear social hierarchies and divisions.

在社会学中，未分层的未分层的社会缺乏明确的社会等级和划分。

5.The research focused on unstratified 未分层的 data to analyze trends without bias from different demographic groups.

该研究专注于未分层的未分层的数据，以分析不受不同人口群体偏见影响的趋势。

6.An unstratified 未分层的 approach to education can lead to a more inclusive learning environment.

一种未分层的未分层的教育方法可以导致更具包容性的学习环境。

7.The lake is filled with unstratified 未分层的 layers of mud and clay, making it difficult for researchers to date its formation.

湖泊中充满了未分层的未分层的泥土和粘土层，使研究人员很难确定其形成时间。

作文

In the study of social structures and dynamics, the term unstratified often arises to describe a society or system that lacks distinct layers or classes. This concept is particularly significant when analyzing the differences between stratified and unstratified societies. A stratified society is characterized by a hierarchical structure where individuals are categorized into different social classes based on wealth, power, education, or occupation. In contrast, an unstratified society presents a more egalitarian view, where there are minimal distinctions between individuals in terms of social status or access to resources. One prominent example of an unstratified society can be found in some indigenous cultures. These communities often operate on principles of shared resources and communal living, which promote equality among their members. In such settings, the absence of rigid class divisions allows for a more cohesive social fabric, fostering cooperation and mutual support. The unstratified nature of these societies can lead to a sense of belonging and collective identity that is sometimes absent in more stratified environments. However, the concept of unstratified societies is not without its challenges. While the lack of formal class structures may seem advantageous, it can also obscure underlying inequalities. For instance, even in communities that appear unstratified, factors such as gender, age, or skill level can create informal hierarchies that influence decision-making and resource distribution. Therefore, while the term suggests a uniformity of status, it is essential to recognize the complexities that can exist within unstratified groups. The implications of living in an unstratified society extend beyond social interactions; they also influence economic practices. In many unstratified communities, economic transactions are often based on barter systems or communal sharing, rather than capitalist models that emphasize individual profit. This approach can lead to sustainable practices, as resources are utilized collectively rather than hoarded by a few individuals. However, the transition from an unstratified to a stratified economic model can have significant consequences, including increased competition and inequality. Furthermore, the idea of unstratified societies raises important questions about governance and leadership. In a system without clear hierarchies, leadership roles may be fluid and based on consensus rather than authority. This can empower individuals to contribute to decision-making processes actively, promoting democratic values. Nevertheless, the absence of defined leadership can also lead to challenges in accountability and organization, particularly during times of crisis. In conclusion, the notion of unstratified societies offers valuable insights into the dynamics of social organization. While these communities may embody ideals of equality and cooperation, it is crucial to examine the nuances that accompany such structures. Understanding the complexities of unstratified societies can provide a broader perspective on social justice and equity, reminding us that true equality goes beyond mere absence of class divisions. As we reflect on our own societies, we should strive to incorporate the strengths of unstratified systems while addressing the underlying inequalities that can still persist within them.

在社会结构和动态的研究中，术语unstratified常常用于描述缺乏明显层次或阶级的社会或系统。这个概念在分析分层社会和unstratified社会之间的差异时尤为重要。分层社会的特点是一个等级结构，个人根据财富、权力、教育或职业被分类到不同的社会阶级。相反，unstratified社会则呈现出更平等的视角，在这种社会中，个人在社会地位或资源获取方面的区别最小。 一些土著文化可以作为unstratified社会的突出例子。这些社区通常基于共享资源和共同生活的原则运作，促进其成员之间的平等。在这样的环境中，缺乏严格的阶级划分使得社会结构更加紧密，促进了合作与相互支持。这种unstratified的特性可以导致一种归属感和集体认同感，这在更分层的环境中有时是缺失的。 然而，unstratified社会的概念并非没有挑战。虽然缺乏正式的阶级结构似乎是有利的，但它也可能掩盖潜在的不平等。例如，即使在看似unstratified的社区中，性别、年龄或技能水平等因素也可能形成影响决策和资源分配的非正式等级。因此，尽管这一术语暗示着地位的统一性，但必须认识到unstratified群体内可能存在的复杂性。 生活在unstratified社会中的影响不仅限于社会互动；它们还影响经济实践。在许多unstratified社区中，经济交易往往基于物物交换或共同分享，而不是强调个人利润的资本主义模式。这种方法可以导致可持续的做法，因为资源是集体利用而不是被少数人囤积。然而，从unstratified转变为分层经济模型可能会产生重大后果，包括竞争和不平等的增加。 此外，unstratified社会的概念引发了关于治理和领导的重要问题。在没有明确等级的系统中，领导角色可能是流动的，基于共识而非权威。这可以使个人积极参与决策过程，促进民主价值观。然而，缺乏明确的领导也可能在危机时期导致问责制和组织上的挑战。 总之，unstratified社会的概念为社会组织的动态提供了宝贵的见解。虽然这些社区可能体现了平等与合作的理想，但审视伴随这些结构的细微差别至关重要。理解unstratified社会的复杂性可以为社会正义和公平提供更广泛的视角，提醒我们真正的平等不仅仅是阶级划分的缺席。当我们反思自己的社会时，我们应努力结合unstratified系统的优势，同时解决仍可能存在的潜在不平等。