vituperation

简明释义

英[vɪˌtjuːpəˈreɪʃn]美[vaɪˌtuːpəˈreɪʃn]

n. 谩骂；辱骂；坏话

复 数 v i t u p e r a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.If two paranoias living in different surroundings meet, then nothing left but quarrel and vituperation.

在截然不同的环境下生活的两个偏执的人相遇了，那就只剩下争执和谩骂了。

2.If two paranoias living in different surroundings meet, then nothing left but quarrel and vituperation.

在截然不同的环境下生活的两个偏执的人相遇了，那就只剩下争执和谩骂了。

3.Denunciatory or abusive language; vituperation.

辱骂谴责的或谩骂的语言；

4.The politician's speech was filled with vituperation, criticizing his opponents harshly.

这位政治家的演讲充满了辱骂，严厉批评他的对手。

5.After the game, the coach's vituperation of the referees left everyone shocked.

比赛结束后，教练对裁判的辱骂让所有人都感到震惊。

6.In the heated debate, both sides resorted to vituperation instead of constructive arguments.

在激烈的辩论中，双方都诉诸于辱骂而不是建设性的论点。

7.Her vituperation towards her colleague was unprofessional and unnecessary.

她对同事的辱骂是不专业且不必要的。

8.The online forum was filled with vituperation as users attacked each other's opinions.

这个在线论坛充满了辱骂，用户们互相攻击彼此的观点。

作文

In today's world, where communication is often instantaneous and public, the way we express our opinions can have significant consequences. One term that encapsulates a particularly harsh form of criticism is vituperation. This word refers to abusive or venomous language used to express blame or censure. In an era dominated by social media, the prevalence of vituperation has increased dramatically, as individuals often resort to harsh words rather than constructive dialogue. Consider the impact of vituperation in political discourse. Politicians frequently engage in heated debates, where they might use vituperation to discredit their opponents. Instead of focusing on policy differences, they attack each other's character, leading to a toxic environment that discourages meaningful discussion. This type of rhetoric not only alienates voters but also diminishes the overall quality of political engagement. When leaders choose vituperation over respectful debate, they set a poor example for their constituents, especially young people who are still forming their views on civic responsibility. Moreover, vituperation is not limited to politics; it can be found in various aspects of society, including education and workplace environments. For instance, teachers who resort to vituperation when addressing student behavior may create a hostile learning atmosphere. Instead of fostering growth and understanding, such language can lead to resentment and disengagement among students. Similarly, in the workplace, managers who use vituperation to criticize employees can damage morale and productivity. A culture of fear and hostility is counterproductive to team cohesion and innovation. The rise of online platforms has also amplified the issue of vituperation. Anonymity emboldens individuals to express their frustrations in hurtful ways, often resulting in cyberbullying and harassment. Social media allows for rapid dissemination of vituperation, which can escalate conflicts and harm reputations without any accountability. The consequences of such behavior can be devastating, affecting mental health and well-being for both the target and the perpetrator. It is essential for users of these platforms to recognize the power of their words and to strive for more constructive forms of communication. In contrast to vituperation, there is a growing movement towards promoting kindness and empathy in our interactions. Many advocates encourage people to engage in civil discourse, focusing on understanding differing perspectives rather than resorting to insults. Practicing active listening and responding with respect can help diffuse tensions and foster a more inclusive environment. By consciously choosing to avoid vituperation, individuals can contribute to a culture of respect and understanding. In conclusion, while vituperation may seem like a powerful tool for expressing dissatisfaction, its long-term effects are often detrimental. Whether in politics, education, or online interactions, the use of vituperation undermines the potential for constructive dialogue and collaboration. As we navigate an increasingly polarized world, it is crucial to recognize the importance of respectful communication. By rejecting vituperation and embracing empathy, we can create a more positive and productive society for everyone.

在当今这个交流往往是瞬时和公开的世界里，我们表达观点的方式可能会产生重大影响。一个特别严厉的批评形式的词汇是vituperation。这个词指的是用来表达指责或谴责的辱骂性或恶毒的语言。在社交媒体主导的时代，vituperation的普遍性显著增加，因为个人往往倾向于使用尖刻的言辞而不是建设性的对话。 考虑一下vituperation在政治话语中的影响。政治家们经常参与激烈的辩论，他们可能会使用vituperation来抹黑对手。与其关注政策差异，他们却攻击彼此的品格，导致一种有毒的环境，阻碍了有意义的讨论。这种修辞不仅使选民感到疏远，而且还降低了政治参与的整体质量。当领导者选择vituperation而不是尊重的辩论时，他们为选民树立了一个不良榜样，尤其是那些仍在形成公民责任观念的年轻人。 此外，vituperation并不仅限于政治；它可以在社会的各个方面找到，包括教育和工作环境。例如，当教师在处理学生行为时诉诸于vituperation，可能会造成敌对的学习氛围。这样的语言不会促进成长和理解，反而可能导致学生的怨恨和失去参与感。同样，在职场中，使用vituperation来批评员工的经理可能会损害士气和生产力。恐惧和敌意的文化对于团队的凝聚力和创新是适得其反的。 在线平台的兴起也加剧了vituperation的问题。匿名性使个人更大胆地以伤人的方式表达他们的不满，往往导致网络欺凌和骚扰。社交媒体允许迅速传播vituperation，这可能加剧冲突并在没有任何责任的情况下损害声誉。这种行为的后果可能是毁灭性的，影响到目标和施害者的心理健康和幸福感。社交媒体用户必须认识到自己言辞的力量，并努力追求更具建设性的交流方式。 与vituperation相反，越来越多的运动提倡在互动中促进善良和同理心。许多倡导者鼓励人们参与文明的对话，专注于理解不同的观点，而不是诉诸于侮辱。实践积极倾听和以尊重的方式回应可以帮助缓解紧张局势，促进更具包容性的环境。通过自觉选择避免vituperation，个人可以为营造尊重和理解的文化做出贡献。 总之，尽管vituperation似乎是表达不满的强大工具，但其长期影响往往是有害的。无论是在政治、教育还是在线互动中，使用vituperation都会削弱建设性对话和合作的潜力。随着我们在日益两极化的世界中导航，认识到尊重交流的重要性至关重要。通过拒绝vituperation并拥抱同理心，我们可以为每个人创造一个更加积极和富有成效的社会。