vivisection

简明释义

英[ˌvɪvɪˈsekʃn]美[ˌvɪvɪˈsekʃn]

n. 活体解剖

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Some people may say, without vivisection, there would not have had so many scientific discoveries.

有人会说了：没有动物试验，就不会有众多的科学发现。

2.And there were no obviously harmful changes on the main visceral organs of the rats by observation of vivisection and tissue dissection.

大鼠的大体解剖观察和病理组织的镜检观察也没有发现明显改变。

3.But the most sinister thing about modern vivisection is this. If a mere sentiment justifies cruelty, why stop at a sentiment for the whole human race?

但是现代活体解剖最为有害的是，如果仅仅是一种感情便可使残忍成为正当的，那么为什么不把这种感情扩展到整个人类上去呢？

4.One particularly glaring inconsistency that should be further investigated is the underlying assumption of vivisection, that we can become healthier by destroying the health of other living beings.

有一个尤其让人震惊的矛盾之处，就是对于活体解剖的默认，认为通过毁坏其他生灵的健康我们会变得更健康。这应当作进一步的调查。

5.The author supports vivisection because it brings many a benefit. The speaker opposes it because he finds it unethical.

作者支持动物实验，因为它带来很多好处。演讲者反对它，因为他感到这是不道德的。

6.Some believe that it is rather brutal to carry out vivisection experiments because animals are human's good friends and they have the rights to survive.

有些人认为做活体实验很残酷是因为动物应该人类的好朋友，应该有他们生存的权利。

7.Some people deem that vivisection experiments are very brutal , because animals are our friends and they have existent right.

有些人认为做活体实验很残酷是因为动物应该人类的好朋友，应该有他们生存的权利。

8.The ethical debate surrounding vivisection 活体解剖 continues to spark controversy among animal rights activists.

围绕vivisection 活体解剖的伦理辩论继续引发动物权利活动家的争议。

9.Many universities have moved away from vivisection 活体解剖 in favor of alternative methods for medical research.

许多大学已经放弃了vivisection 活体解剖，转而采用替代方法进行医学研究。

10.The scientist defended his use of vivisection 活体解剖 by stating that it was essential for the advancement of medicine.

这位科学家为他的vivisection 活体解剖辩护，称其对医学的进步至关重要。

11.Opponents of vivisection 活体解剖 argue that it causes unnecessary suffering to animals.

反对vivisection 活体解剖的人认为这会给动物带来不必要的痛苦。

12.Some researchers believe that vivisection 活体解剖 is a necessary evil in the pursuit of scientific knowledge.

一些研究人员认为，在追求科学知识的过程中，vivisection 活体解剖是一种必要的恶。

作文

The term vivisection refers to the practice of performing operations on live animals for the purpose of experimentation or scientific research. This controversial practice has been a topic of heated debate among scientists, ethicists, and animal rights activists for many years. Proponents argue that vivisection is essential for advancing medical knowledge and developing new treatments for human diseases. They believe that studying living organisms provides invaluable insights into biological processes that cannot be obtained through other means. For instance, researchers often conduct vivisection to observe the effects of drugs on living systems, which can help in understanding how these substances interact with various bodily functions. On the other hand, opponents of vivisection argue that it raises significant ethical concerns. They contend that it is cruel and inhumane to subject animals to pain and suffering for the sake of human benefit. Many animal rights advocates believe that there are alternative methods available, such as computer modeling and in vitro testing, that can replace the need for vivisection. These alternatives not only reduce the harm done to animals but can also provide more accurate results in some cases, as they do not involve the complexities of a living organism. The controversy surrounding vivisection also extends to the regulations governing its practice. In many countries, strict laws are in place to ensure that any research involving live animals is conducted ethically and with minimal suffering. Researchers are often required to demonstrate that their work is necessary and that they have considered all possible alternatives before resorting to vivisection. This regulatory framework aims to strike a balance between the pursuit of scientific knowledge and the welfare of animals. Despite the ongoing debates, vivisection continues to play a role in various fields of research, including pharmacology, toxicology, and psychology. For example, studies involving vivisection have led to significant breakthroughs in understanding diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and neurological disorders. These findings have ultimately contributed to the development of life-saving treatments and therapies that benefit countless individuals. In conclusion, the practice of vivisection is a complex and multifaceted issue that encompasses scientific, ethical, and regulatory dimensions. While it has undoubtedly contributed to medical advancements, it also raises important questions about the treatment of animals in research. As society continues to evolve, it is crucial to engage in thoughtful discussions about the future of vivisection and explore innovative alternatives that prioritize both scientific progress and animal welfare.

术语vivisection指的是在活体动物身上进行手术以用于实验或科学研究的做法。这种有争议的做法多年来一直是科学家、伦理学家和动物权利活动家之间激烈辩论的话题。支持者认为，vivisection对推动医学知识和开发新的人类疾病治疗方法至关重要。他们认为，研究活生物体提供了宝贵的生物过程见解，这些见解无法通过其他方式获得。例如，研究人员经常进行vivisection以观察药物对活体系统的影响，这有助于理解这些物质如何与各种身体功能相互作用。 另一方面，反对vivisection的人认为这引发了重大伦理问题。他们主张，为了人类利益而使动物遭受痛苦是不人道的。许多动物权利倡导者认为，有替代方法可用，如计算机建模和体外测试，可以取代vivisection的需要。这些替代方法不仅减少了对动物造成的伤害，而且在某些情况下可以提供更准确的结果，因为它们不涉及活生物体的复杂性。 围绕vivisection的争议还扩展到其实践的监管。在许多国家，严格的法律法规确保涉及活体动物的任何研究都是在伦理和最小痛苦的情况下进行的。研究人员通常需要证明他们的工作是必要的，并且在诉诸vivisection之前考虑了所有可能的替代方案。这一监管框架旨在在追求科学知识和动物福利之间取得平衡。 尽管争论不断，vivisection仍在药理学、毒理学和心理学等多个研究领域发挥着作用。例如，涉及vivisection的研究导致了对癌症、糖尿病和神经系统疾病等疾病理解的重要突破。这些发现最终促进了拯救无数生命的治疗和疗法的发展。 总之，vivisection的做法是一个复杂且多方面的问题，涵盖了科学、伦理和监管的维度。虽然它无疑对医学进步做出了贡献，但也提出了关于研究中动物待遇的重要问题。随着社会的不断发展，进行深思熟虑的讨论关于vivisection的未来，并探索优先考虑科学进步和动物福利的创新替代方案是至关重要的。